On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:16:05AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > I'd take that a step further and suggest the entire series be split into > independent feature series, as appropriate. Yes, that's what I meant. I just didn't manage to get to the rest yet. > off the rmap bits for the time being. I'm just suggesting that if a > repost is required from this point forward for any of the logical > subunits (deps, rmap, reflink, scrub), I'd suggest to post, version and > changelog those units independently. Agreed. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
