On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:54:15AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 04:19:07PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I've had some vocal user requests to allow enabling reflinks at run time, > > which happens to be a mostly trivial feature. The only caveat is that we > > need a large enough log size to support the reflink requirements, but for > > typical large file systems that's not an issue. > > Hmmm - how does this interact with all the rmap code? I was not > planning on enabling reflink without rmap and vice versa simply > because it makes the validation and testing matrix vastly more > complex. Uh. So far I've only been testing pure reflink code, mostly because rmap really doesn't buy much for the use case I'm working on. Enabling rmap post-mkfs is defintively a different ballpark, and probably not worth it even if it would be doable. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
