On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 09:34:33PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: >> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c >> index e71cfbd..e5d713b 100644 >> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c >> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c >> @@ -1157,9 +1157,7 @@ xfs_buf_ioapply_map( >> >> next_chunk: >> atomic_inc(&bp->b_io_remaining); >> - nr_pages = BIO_MAX_SECTORS >> (PAGE_SHIFT - BBSHIFT); >> - if (nr_pages > total_nr_pages) >> - nr_pages = total_nr_pages; >> + nr_pages = min(total_nr_pages, BIO_MAX_PAGES); >> >> bio = bio_alloc(GFP_NOIO, nr_pages); > > While I think this is a useful cleanup on it's own I think > you'd make everyones life easier if bio_alloc simply clamped down > the passed nr_pages value to the maximum allowed. Yes, that looks a good cleanup, but need be careful because the passed 'nr_pages' can be used after returning from bio_alloc() in the current function, and it is easy to see this usage. So we can do that in another patchset instead of this one. Thanks, > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
