On Wed, Jun 01 2016 at 9:44am -0400, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 08:38:41PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > > be dm-crypt.c. Maybe you've identified some indirect use of > > > BIO_MAX_SIZE? > > > > I mean the recently introduced BIO_MAX_SIZE in -next tree: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c?id=4ed89c97b0706477b822ea2182827640c0cec486 > > The crazy bcache bios striking back once again. I really think it's > harmful having a _MAX value and then having a minor driver > reinterpreting it and sending larger ones. Until we can lift the > maximum limit in general nad have common code exercise it we really need > to stop bcache from sending these instead of littering the tree with > workarounds. So should I not push this type of fix to Linus now? I was going to send the above commit and this one to him this week: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=dm-4.7&id=57b3001b240629ecc5266d28c845e23ca5f11719 Instead, should bcache be made to not do what it is doing? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
