On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:41:28PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Too many people freak out about this fictitious "fragmentation > factor." As shown in the fact, it is largely meaningless, because > the number approaches 100% extremely quickly for just a few > extents per file. > > I thought about removing it altogether, but perhaps a note > about its uselessness, and a more soothing metric (avg extents > per file) might be useful. Heh. Looks reasonable: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
