On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 06:03:15PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Using "TYP_NO_CRC_OFF" seems a little weird from a naming perspective; > it's not really a TYP_* is it? Its opposite is things like > XFS_AGI_CRC_OFF; NO_FIXED_CRC_OFF might be better to not confuse it > with the TYP_ on-disk types? Just a thought. Agreed. How about adding a _F inbetween, e.g. TYP_F_NO_CRC_OFF? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
