On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 02:16:25PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Al Viro noticed that xfs_lock_inodes should be static, and > that led to ... a few more. > > These are just the easy ones, others require moving functions > higher in source files, so that's not done here to keep > this review simple. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > We aren't using STATIC anymore ... right? We're moving away from it at least, although not very stringently.. > FWIW cross-applying to xfsprogs picks up a handful of these > as well, and it's still happy too. Yeah - seems like none of them is of the odd static in kernel but not in xfsprogs kind. Looks fine, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
