19.05.2016 17:37, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz пишет: > Control: reopen -1 > > Hi Michael! > > You closed a bug in src:xfsprogs with a new version of qemu, I don't > think this is correct and this bug should therefore be reopened. > > While qemu doesn't seem to be affected by this particular issue anymore, > I don't think the bug in src:xfsprogs itself has been fixed since there > hasn't been a new upload of xfsprogs since February. > > Please be more careful when handling of bug reports! Actually it is more interesting. This bug is listed in qemu bug list, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=qemu , AND in xfsprogs bug list, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=xfsprogs I closed it thinking it is in qemu. But I closed it wrongly anyway, and that's where I should've been more careful. In qemu there was a workaround proposed for this issue, but it hasn't been applied, and I thought it has been. So it has already been reopened meanwhile. How it is present in both qemu and xfsprogs bug lists, I've no idea :) /mjt _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
