On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 09:47:45PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > We should really collapse our 3 cvtnum variants, > but for now at least shut up Coverity about this > intentional case fallthrough. > Looks good Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx> > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1361553 > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1361554 > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1361555 > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1361556 > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > diff --git a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c > index 955dcfd..12fe8f3 100644 > --- a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c > +++ b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c > @@ -3623,14 +3623,19 @@ cvtnum( > switch (c) { > case 'e': > i *= 1024LL; > + /* fall through */ > case 'p': > i *= 1024LL; > + /* fall through */ > case 't': > i *= 1024LL; > + /* fall through */ > case 'g': > i *= 1024LL; > + /* fall through */ > case 'm': > i *= 1024LL; > + /* fall through */ > case 'k': > return i * 1024LL; > default: > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs -- Carlos _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs