2016年5月11日 08:10，"Dave Chinner" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>写道：
>
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 10:48:34PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > When use GETNEXTQUOTA ioctl to report project quota, it always
> > report an unexpected quota:
> >
> > (null) 0 0 0 00 [--------]
> >
> > The ID 0 store the default quota, even if no one set default quota,
> > it still have quota accounting, but not enforced. So GETNEXTQUOTA
> > can find and report this undefined quota.
> >
> > From this problem, I thought if others' quota name miss, (null) will
> > be printed too. e.g.
> >
> > # xfs_quota -xc "limit -u bsoft=300m bhard=400m test" $mnt
> > # xfs_quota -xc "report -u" $mnt
> > User ID Used Soft Hard Warn/Grace
> > ---------- --------------------------------------------------
> > root 0 0 0 00 [--------]
> > test 0 307200 409600 00 [--------]
> > # userdel -r test
> > # xfs_quota -xc "report -u" $mnt
> > User ID Used Soft Hard Warn/Grace
> > ---------- --------------------------------------------------
> > root 0 0 0 00 [--------]
> > (null) 0 307200 409600 00 [--------]
> >
> > So this problem same with above id 0's problem. For deal with this,
> > this patch will print id number if the name can't be found.
> >
> > But if use old GETQUOTA ioctl, it won't print project id 0 quota
> > information(if it's not defined). That's different with GETNEXTQUOTA.
> > For keep consistent, this patch also print project id 0 when use old
> > GETQUOTA.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> OK, so with this applied xfs/133 and xfs/134 both now fail with
> this extra output:
>
> +#0 0 0 0 00 [--------]
>
> Can you send patches for these tests to filter out these lines so
> that the tests pass again for both old and new xfsprogs?
Hi Dave,
Sure, I'm doing on this. I remember that a patch from Eryu maybe suit for this xfsprogs change(maybe need some modify). I'll check it and send a suitable patch as soon as possible.
Thanks,
Zorro
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
