On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 09:28:10PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > In most cases, EPERM is returned on immutable inode, and there're only > a few places returning EACCES. And EPERM looks more reasonable to me. > > So converting all EACCES to EPERM on immutable inode. > > Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > > I noticed this when running LTP on overlayfs, setxattr03 failed due to > unexpected EACCES on immutable inode. This should be in the commit message itself, rather than "EPERM looks more reasonable". Other than that, change seems fine to me. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
