On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 12:54:37AM -0600, Vishal Verma wrote: > On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 23:34 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Hi Vishal, > > > > still NAK to calling the direct I/O code directly from the dax code. > > Hm, I thought this was what you meant -- do the fallback/retry attempts > at the callers of dax_do_io instead of the new dax wrapper function.. > Did I misunderstand you? Sorry, it is. I misread fs/block_dev.c as fs/dax.c before my first coffee this morning. I'll properly review the series in the afternoon.. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
