Re: [PATCH] xfs: don't hand out pNFS layouts for reflink inodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 09:21:28AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:51:40PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > >  	/*
> > > +	 * The pNFS block layout spec actually supports reflink like
> > > +	 * functionality, but the Linux pNFS server doesn't implement it yet.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	if (!xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip))
> > > +		return -ENXIO;
> > 
> > /me isn't familiar with pNFS, but doesn't this make it so that
> > xfs_fs_map_blocks /only/ works on reflinked files?  Maybe I'm misreading the
> > comment, but it sounds to me like Linux doesn't support reflinked files over
> > pNFS and therefore we want to disable this iomapping functionality any time we
> > find a reflinked file.
> > 
> > But maybe there's a subtlety here that I'm missing?
> 
> You jsut missed me fat fingering the check :)

Fair enough, I'll integrate this patch, but with:

if (xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip))
	return -ENXIO;

> Btw, we'll need something similar to prevent swapfiles which just use
> ->bmap, but unfortunately swap just checks for the existences of method,
> so I'll probably have to do some VFS changes to properly support that.

Yes, please.  ocfs2 will gladly let you call swapon on a reflinked file,
and totally fails to CoW it properly. :)

--D

> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs



[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux