Re: [GIT PULL] xfs: updates for 4.6-rc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon 21-03-16 13:05:05, Dave Chinner wrote:
The resolution of conflict in fs/ext4/inode.c is fine except for one minor
issue:

> diff --cc fs/ext4/inode.c
> index b2e9576,2b98171..e5ba3b0
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@@ -3289,10 -3161,10 +3289,10 @@@ out
>   }
>   #endif
>   
> - static void ext4_end_io_dio(struct kiocb *iocb, loff_t offset,
> + static int ext4_end_io_dio(struct kiocb *iocb, loff_t offset,
>   			    ssize_t size, void *private)
>   {
>  -        ext4_io_end_t *io_end = iocb->private;
>  +        ext4_io_end_t *io_end = private;
>   
>   	/* if not async direct IO just return */
>   	if (!io_end)
> @@@ -3300,8 -3172,18 +3300,17 @@@
>   
>   	ext_debug("ext4_end_io_dio(): io_end 0x%p "
>   		  "for inode %lu, iocb 0x%p, offset %llu, size %zd\n",
>  - 		  iocb->private, io_end->inode->i_ino, iocb, offset,
>  -		  size);
>  +		  io_end, io_end->inode->i_ino, iocb, offset, size);
>   
> + 	iocb->private = NULL;

The line above should not exist in the result. It does no harm but is
unnecessary.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs



[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux