On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:57:51PM +0100, Jens Rosenboom wrote:
>> 2016-02-14 1:16 GMT+01:00 Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 06:09:17PM +0100, Jens Rosenboom wrote:
>> >> 2016-01-26 15:17 GMT+01:00 Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> >> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:58:53PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> >> We have seen this issue on our production Ceph cluster sporadically
>> >> and have tried a long time to reproduce it in a lab environment.
>> > ....
>> >> kmem_alloc (mode:0x2408240)
>> >> Feb 13 10:51:57 storage-node35 kernel: [10562.614089] XFS:
>> >> ceph-osd(10078) possible memory allocation deadlock size 32856 in
>> >> kmem_alloc (mode:0x2408240)
>> >
>> > High order allocation of 32k. That implies a buffer size of at least
>> > 32k is in use. Can you tell me what the output of xfs_info <mntpt>
>> > is for one of your filesystems?
>>
>> $ xfs_info /tmp/cbt/mnt/osd-device-0-data/
>> meta-data=/dev/sda2 isize=2048 agcount=4, agsize=97370688 blks
>> = sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1
>> = crc=0 finobt=0
>> data = bsize=4096 blocks=389482752, imaxpct=5
>> = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
>> naming =version 2 bsize=65536 ascii-ci=0 ftype=0
>> log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=190177, version=2
>> = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
>> realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
>
> OK, so 64k directory block size.
>
>> > I suspect you are using a 64k directory block size, in which case
>> > I'll ask "are you storing millions of files in a single directory"?
>> > If your answer is no, then "don't do that" is an appropriate
>> > solution because large directory block sizes are slower than the
>> > default (4k) for almost all operations until you get up into the
>> > millions of files per directory range.
>>
>> These options are kind of standard folklore for setting up Ceph
>> clusters, I must admit that I delayed testing their performance
>> implications up to now, so many knobs to turn, so little time.
>>
>> mkfs_opts: '-f -i size=2048 -n size=64k'
>> mount_opts: '-o inode64,noatime,logbsize=256k'
>
> /me shakes his head sadly.
>
> Can you please go nuke where ever you read that from orbit? Please?
> It's the only way to be sure that the contagious cargo-cult
> stupidity doesn't spread further.
>
>> It turns out that when running with '-n size=4k'
>
> i.e. the default.
>
>> , indeed I do not get
>> any warnings during a 10h test run. I'll try to come up with some more
>> detailed benchmarking of the possible performance impacts, too.
>
> No surprise there. :/
>
> FWIW, for small file Ceph workloads (e.g swift stores) we've found
> that 8k directory block sizes give marginal improvements over the
> default 4k, but it's all down hill from there.
>
>> Am I right in assuming that this parameter can not be tuned after the
>> initial mkfs?
>
> That's right.
>
>> In that case getting a production-ready version of your
>> patch would probably still be valuable for cluster admins wanting to
>> avoid having to move all of their data to new filesystems.
>
> Well, yes, that's why I'm working on it. But it's critical core
> code, it's also damn tricky and complex, and if I get it wrong it
> will corrupt filesystems. So I'm not going to rush a prototype fix
> out into production systems no matter how much pressure people put
> on me to ship a fix.
>
>> >> Soon after this, operations get so slow that the OSDs die because of
>> >> their suicide timeouts.
>> >>
>> >> Then I installed onto 3 servers this patch (applied onto kernel
>> >> v4.4.1). The bad news is that I am still getting the kernel messages
>> >> on these machines. The good news, though, is that they appear at a
>> >> much lower frequency and also the impact on performance seems to be
>> >> lower, so the OSD processes on these three nodes did not get killed.
>> >
>> > Right, the patch doesn't fix the underlying issue that memory
>> > fragmentation can prevent high order allocation from succeeding for
>> > long periods. However, it does ensure that the filesystem does not
>> > immediately deadlock memory reclaim when it happens so the system
>> > has a chance to recover. It still can deadlock the filesystem,
>> > because if we can't commit the transaction we can't unlock the
>> > objects in the transaction and everything can get stuck behind that
>> > if there's something sufficiently important in the blocked
>> > transaction.
>>
>> So how would your success criteria for getting this patch into
>> upstream look like?
>
> It's already "successful". I've proved locally that it avoids a memory
> reclaim deadlock that many people have reported over the past year.
> So there's no question that we need a fix to the problem; it's now
> just a matter of determining if the issues with this fix (e.g.
> doubling memory usage of the CIL) are an acceptible tradeoff for
> production workloads, or whether I've got to go back and prototype a
> fourth attempt at fixing the problem...
>
> And, of course, there's only some many hours int eh day. I'm into my
> 19th right now, and I havent' got through everything on my list for
> today yet. Tomorrow's list is even longer, and when I get through
> that, I hit the big one: "read, understand and review 10000 lines of
> complex new code"....
>
>> Would a benchmark of the 64k directory block size
>> case on machines all running with patched kernels be interesting? Or
>> would that scenario disqualify itself as being mistuned in the first
>> place?
>
> Not really - I've confirmed it doesn't cause performance issues on
> my usual tranche of benhmarks, so I'mnot conerned about that (it;s
> the same amount of work being done, anyway). Correctness is much
> more important right now, and that takes time, effort and focus to
> verify.
>
> And speaking of focus, it's now time for me to sleep.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
I've recently backported the patch to the v3.13 kernel to see if the bug
can be fixed by the patch. Currently, since the bug only can be reproduced
on the production system, I need to ensure the code work correctly before
deploying the kernel. The following is the v3.13 backported kernel source:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/gavinguo/ubuntu-trusty-amd64.git/log/?h=hf00084724v20160219b0hc57647a
I also did the xfstests verification and the log is attached. There are
failed 7 of 93 tests. Investigation is still ongoing to determine if these
errors are related to the file system core functionality failure due to the
backporting incorrection.
I'll appreciate if you can give any suggestion to do the testing, give a
glance to the backported patch or the xfstests error log to see if there is
any thing wrong.
ubuntu@xfs-test-vm:~/os/xfstests$ uname -a
Linux xfs-test-vm 3.13.0-77-generic #121hf00084724v20160219b0hc57647a SMP Fri Feb 19 08:49:18 UTC 20 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
ubuntu@xfs-test-vm:~/os/xfstests$ TEST_DEV="/dev/vdb" TEST_DIR="/mnt/xfs_mnt/" ./check
check: QA must be run as root
ubuntu@xfs-test-vm:~/os/xfstests$ sudo !!
sudo TEST_DEV="/dev/vdb" TEST_DIR="/mnt/xfs_mnt/" ./check
sudo: unable to resolve host xfs-test-vm
FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug)
PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 xfs-test-vm 3.13.0-77-generic
generic/001 3s
generic/002 0s
generic/003 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/004 [not run] xfs_io flink support is missing
generic/005 0s
generic/006 0s
generic/007 1s
generic/008 [not run] xfs_io fzero support is missing
generic/009 [not run] xfs_io fzero support is missing
generic/010 0s
generic/011 1s
generic/012 [not run] xfs_io fcollapse support is missing
generic/013 24s
generic/014 9s
generic/015 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/016 [not run] xfs_io fcollapse support is missing
generic/017 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/018 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/019 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/020 3s
generic/021 [not run] xfs_io fcollapse support is missing
generic/022 [not run] xfs_io fcollapse support is missing
generic/023 [not run] kernel doesn't support renameat2 syscall
generic/024 [not run] kernel doesn't support renameat2 syscall
generic/025 [not run] kernel doesn't support renameat2 syscall
generic/026 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/027 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/028 5s
generic/029 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/030 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/031 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/032 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/033 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/034 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/035 0s
generic/036 10s
generic/037 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/038 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/039 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/040 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/041 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/042 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/043 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/044 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/045 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/046 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/047 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/048 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/049 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/050 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/051 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/052 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/053 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/054 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/055 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/056 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/057 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/058 [not run] xfs_io finsert support is missing
generic/059 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/060 [not run] xfs_io finsert support is missing
generic/061 [not run] xfs_io finsert support is missing
generic/062 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/063 [not run] xfs_io finsert support is missing
generic/064 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/065 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/066 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/067 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/068 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/069 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/070 6s
generic/071 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/072 [not run] xfs_io fcollapse support is missing
generic/073 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/074 104s
generic/075 29s
generic/076 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/077 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/078 [not run] kernel doesn't support renameat2 syscall
generic/079 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/080 3s
generic/081 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/082 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/083 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/084 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/085 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/086 1s
generic/087 1s
generic/088 1s
generic/089 5s
generic/090 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/091 70s
generic/092 0s
generic/093 [not run] not suitable for this OS: Linux
generic/094 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/095 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/096 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/097 [not run] not suitable for this OS: Linux
generic/098 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/099 [not run] not suitable for this OS: Linux
generic/100 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/101 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/102 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/103 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/104 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/105 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/106 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/107 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/108 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/109 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/110 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/111 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/112 35s
generic/113 39s
generic/114 53s
generic/115 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/116 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/117 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/118 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/119 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/120 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/121 [not run] xfs_io dedupe support is missing
generic/122 [not run] xfs_io dedupe support is missing
generic/123 1s
generic/124 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/125 62s
generic/126 0s
generic/127 715s
generic/128 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/129 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/130 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/131 1s
generic/132 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/133 268s
generic/134 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/135 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/136 [not run] xfs_io dedupe support is missing
generic/137 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/138 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/139 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/140 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/141 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/142 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/143 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/144 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/145 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/146 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/147 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/148 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/149 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/150 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/151 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/152 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/153 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/154 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/155 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/156 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/157 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/158 [not run] xfs_io dedupe support is missing
generic/159 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/160 [not run] xfs_io dedupe support is missing
generic/161 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/162 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/163 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/164 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/165 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/166 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/167 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/168 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/169 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/170 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/171 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/172 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/173 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/174 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/175 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/176 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/177 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/178 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/179 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/180 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/181 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/182 [not run] xfs_io dedupe support is missing
generic/183 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/184 0s
generic/185 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/186 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/187 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/188 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/189 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/190 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/191 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/192 42s
generic/193 0s
generic/194 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/195 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/196 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/197 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/198 1s
generic/199 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/200 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/201 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/202 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/203 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/204 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/205 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/206 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/207 13s
generic/208 201s
umount: /mnt/xfs_mnt: device is busy.
(In some cases useful info about processes that use
the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(1))
_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/vdb has dirty log (see /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//generic/208.full)
_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/vdb is inconsistent (c) (see /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//generic/208.full)
_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/vdb is inconsistent (r) (see /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//generic/208.full)
generic/209 37s
generic/210 0s
generic/211 0s
generic/212 0s
generic/213 1s
generic/214 0s
generic/215 2s
generic/216 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/217 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/218 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/219 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/220 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/221 1s
generic/222 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/223 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/224 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/225 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/226 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/227 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/228 0s
generic/229 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/230 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/231 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/232 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/233 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/234 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/235 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/236 2s
generic/237 [not run] chacl command not found
generic/238 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/239 3s
generic/240 0s
generic/241 72s
generic/242 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/243 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/244 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/245 0s
generic/246 1s
generic/247 28s
_check_dmesg: something found in dmesg (see /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//generic/247.dmesg)
generic/248 0s
generic/249 1s
generic/250 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/251 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/252 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/253 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/254 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/255 1s
generic/256 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/257 0s
generic/258 0s
generic/259 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/260 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/261 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/262 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/263 [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//generic/263.out.bad)
--- tests/generic/263.out 2016-03-02 07:03:04.063808319 +0000
+++ /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//generic/263.out.bad 2016-03-02 07:53:20.511808319 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,8887 @@
QA output created by 263
fsx -N 10000 -o 8192 -l 500000 -r PSIZE -t BSIZE -w BSIZE -Z
fsx -N 10000 -o 128000 -l 500000 -r PSIZE -t BSIZE -w BSIZE -Z
+main: filesystem does not support fallocate mode FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE, disabling!
+main: filesystem does not support fallocate mode FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE, disabling!
+main: filesystem does not support fallocate mode FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE, disabling!
+truncating to largest ever: 0x11e00
...
(Run 'diff -u tests/generic/263.out /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//generic/263.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
generic/264 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/265 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/266 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/267 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/268 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/269 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/270 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/271 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/272 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/273 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/274 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/275 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/276 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/277 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/278 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/279 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/280 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/281 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/282 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/283 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/284 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/285 0s
generic/286 5s
generic/287 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/288 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/289 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/290 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/291 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/292 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/293 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/294 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/295 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/296 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/297 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/298 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/299 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/300 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/301 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/302 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/303 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
generic/304 [not run] xfs_io dedupe support is missing
generic/305 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/306 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/307 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/308 0s
generic/309 1s
generic/310 65s
generic/311 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/312 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/313 4s
generic/314 [not run] chacl command not found
generic/315 0s
generic/316 1s
generic/317 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/318 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/319 [not run] chacl command not found
generic/320 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/321 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/322 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/323 121s
generic/324 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/325 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/326 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/327 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/328 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/329 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/330 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/331 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/332 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/333 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/334 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/335 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/336 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
generic/337 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
shared/001 [not run] not suitable for this filesystem type: xfs
shared/002 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
shared/003 [not run] not suitable for this filesystem type: xfs
shared/006 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
shared/032 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
shared/051 [not run] chacl command not found
shared/272 [not run] not suitable for this filesystem type: xfs
shared/289 [not run] not suitable for this filesystem type: xfs
shared/298 45s
xfs/001 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/002 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/003 0s
xfs/004 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/005 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/006 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/007 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/008 2s
xfs/009 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/010 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/011 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/012 2s
xfs/013 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/014 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/015 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/016 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/017 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/018 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/019 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/020 [failed, exit status 139] - output mismatch (see /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//xfs/020.out.bad)
--- tests/xfs/020.out 2016-03-02 07:03:04.083808319 +0000
+++ /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//xfs/020.out.bad 2016-03-02 07:58:56.063808319 +0000
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
QA output created by 020
Silence is golden
+./tests/xfs/020: line 58: 28658 Segmentation fault $XFS_REPAIR_PROG -f -o ag_stride=32 -t 1 $fsfile > /dev/null 2>&1
...
(Run 'diff -u tests/xfs/020.out /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//xfs/020.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
xfs/021 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/022 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/023 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/024 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/025 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/026 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/027 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/028 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/029 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/030 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/031 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/032 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/033 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/034 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/035 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/036 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/037 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/038 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/039 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/040 [not run] Can't run srcdiff without KWORKAREA set
xfs/041 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/042 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/043 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/044 [not run] This test requires a valid $SCRATCH_LOGDEV
xfs/045 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/046 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/047 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/048 0s
xfs/049 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/050 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/051 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/052 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/053 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/054 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/055 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/056 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/057 [not run] Place holder for IRIX test 057
xfs/058 [not run] Place holder for IRIX test 058
xfs/059 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/060 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/061 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/062 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/063 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/064 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/065 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/066 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/067 [not run] chacl command not found
xfs/068 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/069 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/070 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/071 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/072 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/073 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/074 [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//xfs/074.out.bad)
--- tests/xfs/074.out 2016-03-02 07:03:04.095808319 +0000
+++ /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//xfs/074.out.bad 2016-03-02 07:59:19.943808319 +0000
@@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
QA output created by 074
-Silence is golden
+fallocate: No space left on device
+_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/loop0 is inconsistent (c) (see /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//xfs/074.full)
+_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/loop0 is inconsistent (r) (see /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//xfs/074.full)
...
(Run 'diff -u tests/xfs/074.out /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//xfs/074.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
xfs/075 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/076 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/077 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/078 48s
xfs/079 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/080 5s
xfs/081 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/082 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/083 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/084 60s
xfs/085 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/086 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/087 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/088 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/089 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/090 [not run] External volumes not in use, skipped this test
xfs/091 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/092 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/093 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/094 [not run] External volumes not in use, skipped this test
xfs/095 [not run] not suitable for this OS: Linux
xfs/096 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/097 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/098 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/099 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/100 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/101 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/102 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/103 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/104 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/105 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/106 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/107 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/108 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/109 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/110 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/111 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/112 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/113 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/114 [not run] not suitable for this OS: Linux
xfs/115 [not run] not suitable for this OS: Linux
xfs/116 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/117 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/118 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/119 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/120 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/121 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/122 [not run] indent utility required, skipped this test
xfs/123 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/124 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/125 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/126 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/127 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/128 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/129 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/130 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/131 [not run] External volumes not in use, skipped this test
xfs/132 [not run] xfs_io reflink support is missing
xfs/133 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/134 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/135 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/136 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/137 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/138 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/139 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/140 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/141 [not run] no kernel support for XFS sysfs attributes
xfs/142 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/143 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/144 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/145 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/146 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/147 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/148 [not run] parallel repair binary xfs_prepair64 is not installed
xfs/149 [not run] parallel repair binary xfs_prepair is not installed
xfs/150 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/151 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/152 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/153 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/154 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/155 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/156 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/157 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/158 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/159 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/160 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/161 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/162 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/163 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/164 0s
xfs/165 0s
xfs/166 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/167 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/168 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/169 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/170 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/171 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/172 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/173 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/174 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/175 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/176 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/177 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/178 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/179 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/180 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/181 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/182 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/183 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/184 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/185 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/186 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/187 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/188 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/189 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/190 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/191 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/192 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/193 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/194 [not run] sector size(4096) too large for platform page size(4096)
xfs/195 [not run] xfsdump utility required, skipped this test
xfs/196 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/197 [not run] This test is only valid on 32 bit machines
xfs/198 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/199 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/200 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/201 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/202 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/203 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/204 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/205 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/206 4s
xfs/207 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/208 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/209 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/210 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/211 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/212 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/213 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/214 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/215 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/216 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/217 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/218 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/219 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/220 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/221 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/222 0s
xfs/223 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/224 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/225 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/226 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/227 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/228 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/229 75s
xfs/230 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/231 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/232 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/233 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/234 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/235 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/236 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/237 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/238 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/239 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/240 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/241 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/242 1s
xfs/243 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/244 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/245 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/246 [not run] xfs_io bmap doesn't support -c
xfs/247 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/248 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/249 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/250 [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//xfs/250.out.bad)
--- tests/xfs/250.out 2016-03-02 07:03:04.119808319 +0000
+++ /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//xfs/250.out.bad 2016-03-02 08:03:49.847808319 +0000
@@ -11,4 +11,4 @@
*** preallocate large file
*** unmount loop filesystem
*** check loop filesystem
-*** done
+_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /mnt/xfs_mnt/250.fs is inconsistent (r) (see /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//xfs/250.full)
...
(Run 'diff -u tests/xfs/250.out /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//xfs/250.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
xfs/251 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/252 2s
xfs/253 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/254 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/255 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/256 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/257 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/258 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/259 2s
xfs/260 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/261 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/262 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/266 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/267 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/268 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/278 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/279 7s
xfs/281 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/282 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/283 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/287 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/290 1s
xfs/291 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/292 - output mismatch (see /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//xfs/292.out.bad)
--- tests/xfs/292.out 2016-03-02 07:03:04.123808319 +0000
+++ /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//xfs/292.out.bad 2016-03-02 08:04:19.487808319 +0000
@@ -5,5 +5,5 @@
agsize=16777216
mkfs.xfs with cmdline geometry
ddev=FILENAME
-agcount=16
-agsize=4194304
+agcount=4
+agsize=16777216
...
(Run 'diff -u tests/xfs/292.out /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//xfs/292.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
xfs/293 - output mismatch (see /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//xfs/293.out.bad)
--- tests/xfs/293.out 2016-03-02 07:03:04.123808319 +0000
+++ /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//xfs/293.out.bad 2016-03-02 08:04:22.499808319 +0000
@@ -1,2 +1,8 @@
QA output created by 293
Silence is golden
+chproj not documented in the xfs_io manpage
+fiemap not documented in the xfs_io manpage
+fpunch not documented in the xfs_io manpage
+lsproj not documented in the xfs_io manpage
+setfl not documented in the xfs_io manpage
...
(Run 'diff -u tests/xfs/293.out /home/ubuntu/os/xfstests/results//xfs/293.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
xfs/295 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/296 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/297 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/298 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/299 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/300 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/301 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/302 [not run] xfsdump not found
xfs/303 1s
xfs/304 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
xfs/305 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV
Ran: generic/001 generic/002 generic/005 generic/006 generic/007 generic/010 generic/011 generic/013 generic/014 generic/020 generic/028 generic/035 generic/036 generic/070 generic/074 generic/075 generic/080 generic/086 generic/087 generic/088 generic/089 generic/091 generic/092 generic/112 generic/113 generic/114 generic/123 generic/125 generic/126 generic/127 generic/131 generic/133 generic/184 generic/192 generic/193 generic/198 generic/207 generic/208 generic/209 generic/210 generic/211 generic/212 generic/213 generic/214 generic/215 generic/221 generic/228 generic/236 generic/239 generic/240 generic/241 generic/245 generic/246 generic/247 generic/248 generic/249 generic/255 generic/257 generic/258 generic/263 generic/285 generic/286 generic/308 generic/309 generic/310 generic/313 generic/315 generic/316 generic/323 shared/298 xfs/003 xfs/008 xfs/012 xfs/020 xfs/048 xfs/074 xfs/078 xfs/080 xfs/084 xfs/164 xfs/165 xfs/206 xfs/222 xfs/229 xfs/242 xfs/250 xfs/252 xfs/259 xfs/279 xfs/290 xfs/292 xfs/293 xfs/303
Not run: generic/003 generic/004 generic/008 generic/009 generic/012 generic/015 generic/016 generic/017 generic/018 generic/019 generic/021 generic/022 generic/023 generic/024 generic/025 generic/026 generic/027 generic/029 generic/030 generic/031 generic/032 generic/033 generic/034 generic/037 generic/038 generic/039 generic/040 generic/041 generic/042 generic/043 generic/044 generic/045 generic/046 generic/047 generic/048 generic/049 generic/050 generic/051 generic/052 generic/053 generic/054 generic/055 generic/056 generic/057 generic/058 generic/059 generic/060 generic/061 generic/062 generic/063 generic/064 generic/065 generic/066 generic/067 generic/068 generic/069 generic/071 generic/072 generic/073 generic/076 generic/077 generic/078 generic/079 generic/081 generic/082 generic/083 generic/084 generic/085 generic/090 generic/093 generic/094 generic/095 generic/096 generic/097 generic/098 generic/099 generic/100 generic/101 generic/102 generic/103 generic/104 generic/105 generic/106 generic/107 generic/108 generic/109 generic/110 generic/111 generic/115 generic/116 generic/117 generic/118 generic/119 generic/120 generic/121 generic/122 generic/124 generic/128 generic/129 generic/130 generic/132 generic/134 generic/135 generic/136 generic/137 generic/138 generic/139 generic/140 generic/141 generic/142 generic/143 generic/144 generic/145 generic/146 generic/147 generic/148 generic/149 generic/150 generic/151 generic/152 generic/153 generic/154 generic/155 generic/156 generic/157 generic/158 generic/159 generic/160 generic/161 generic/162 generic/163 generic/164 generic/165 generic/166 generic/167 generic/168 generic/169 generic/170 generic/171 generic/172 generic/173 generic/174 generic/175 generic/176 generic/177 generic/178 generic/179 generic/180 generic/181 generic/182 generic/183 generic/185 generic/186 generic/187 generic/188 generic/189 generic/190 generic/191 generic/194 generic/195 generic/196 generic/197 generic/199 generic/200 generic/201 generic/202 generic/203 generic/204 generic/205 generic/206 generic/216 generic/217 generic/218 generic/219 generic/220 generic/222 generic/223 generic/224 generic/225 generic/226 generic/227 generic/229 generic/230 generic/231 generic/232 generic/233 generic/234 generic/235 generic/237 generic/238 generic/242 generic/243 generic/244 generic/250 generic/251 generic/252 generic/253 generic/254 generic/256 generic/259 generic/260 generic/261 generic/262 generic/264 generic/265 generic/266 generic/267 generic/268 generic/269 generic/270 generic/271 generic/272 generic/273 generic/274 generic/275 generic/276 generic/277 generic/278 generic/279 generic/280 generic/281 generic/282 generic/283 generic/284 generic/287 generic/288 generic/289 generic/290 generic/291 generic/292 generic/293 generic/294 generic/295 generic/296 generic/297 generic/298 generic/299 generic/300 generic/301 generic/302 generic/303 generic/304 generic/305 generic/306 generic/307 generic/311 generic/312 generic/314 generic/317 generic/318 generic/319 generic/320 generic/321 generic/322 generic/324 generic/325 generic/326 generic/327 generic/328 generic/329 generic/330 generic/331 generic/332 generic/333 generic/334 generic/335 generic/336 generic/337 shared/001 shared/002 shared/003 shared/006 shared/032 shared/051 shared/272 shared/289 xfs/001 xfs/002 xfs/004 xfs/005 xfs/006 xfs/007 xfs/009 xfs/010 xfs/011 xfs/013 xfs/014 xfs/015 xfs/016 xfs/017 xfs/018 xfs/019 xfs/021 xfs/022 xfs/023 xfs/024 xfs/025 xfs/026 xfs/027 xfs/028 xfs/029 xfs/030 xfs/031 xfs/032 xfs/033 xfs/034 xfs/035 xfs/036 xfs/037 xfs/038 xfs/039 xfs/040 xfs/041 xfs/042 xfs/043 xfs/044 xfs/045 xfs/046 xfs/047 xfs/049 xfs/050 xfs/051 xfs/052 xfs/053 xfs/054 xfs/055 xfs/056 xfs/057 xfs/058 xfs/059 xfs/060 xfs/061 xfs/062 xfs/063 xfs/064 xfs/065 xfs/066 xfs/067 xfs/068 xfs/069 xfs/070 xfs/071 xfs/072 xfs/073 xfs/075 xfs/076 xfs/077 xfs/079 xfs/081 xfs/082 xfs/083 xfs/085 xfs/086 xfs/087 xfs/088 xfs/089 xfs/090 xfs/091 xfs/092 xfs/093 xfs/094 xfs/095 xfs/096 xfs/097 xfs/098 xfs/099 xfs/100 xfs/101 xfs/102 xfs/103 xfs/104 xfs/105 xfs/106 xfs/107 xfs/108 xfs/109 xfs/110 xfs/111 xfs/112 xfs/113 xfs/114 xfs/115 xfs/116 xfs/117 xfs/118 xfs/119 xfs/120 xfs/121 xfs/122 xfs/123 xfs/124 xfs/125 xfs/126 xfs/127 xfs/128 xfs/129 xfs/130 xfs/131 xfs/132 xfs/133 xfs/134 xfs/135 xfs/136 xfs/137 xfs/138 xfs/139 xfs/140 xfs/141 xfs/142 xfs/143 xfs/144 xfs/145 xfs/146 xfs/147 xfs/148 xfs/149 xfs/150 xfs/151 xfs/152 xfs/153 xfs/154 xfs/155 xfs/156 xfs/157 xfs/158 xfs/159 xfs/160 xfs/161 xfs/162 xfs/163 xfs/166 xfs/167 xfs/168 xfs/169 xfs/170 xfs/171 xfs/172 xfs/173 xfs/174 xfs/175 xfs/176 xfs/177 xfs/178 xfs/179 xfs/180 xfs/181 xfs/182 xfs/183 xfs/184 xfs/185 xfs/186 xfs/187 xfs/188 xfs/189 xfs/190 xfs/191 xfs/192 xfs/193 xfs/194 xfs/195 xfs/196 xfs/197 xfs/198 xfs/199 xfs/200 xfs/201 xfs/202 xfs/203 xfs/204 xfs/205 xfs/207 xfs/208 xfs/209 xfs/210 xfs/211 xfs/212 xfs/213 xfs/214 xfs/215 xfs/216 xfs/217 xfs/218 xfs/219 xfs/220 xfs/221 xfs/223 xfs/224 xfs/225 xfs/226 xfs/227 xfs/228 xfs/230 xfs/231 xfs/232 xfs/233 xfs/234 xfs/235 xfs/236 xfs/237 xfs/238 xfs/239 xfs/240 xfs/241 xfs/243 xfs/244 xfs/245 xfs/246 xfs/247 xfs/248 xfs/249 xfs/251 xfs/253 xfs/254 xfs/255 xfs/256 xfs/257 xfs/258 xfs/260 xfs/261 xfs/262 xfs/266 xfs/267 xfs/268 xfs/278 xfs/281 xfs/282 xfs/283 xfs/287 xfs/291 xfs/295 xfs/296 xfs/297 xfs/298 xfs/299 xfs/300 xfs/301 xfs/302 xfs/304 xfs/305
Failures: generic/247 generic/263 xfs/020 xfs/074 xfs/250 xfs/292 xfs/293
Failed 7 of 93 tests
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
