Hi Andreas, On 02/22/2016 03:46 PM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) > <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I've once more pulled from the latest git; here's some more comments. > > thanks again. I've updated the repo with your changes. Next round :-). Just a few quick comments while I'm on a train ride. > .\" > .\" RichACL Manual Pages > .\" > .\" Copyright (C) 2015,2016 Red Hat, Inc. > .\" Written by Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx> > .\" This is free documentation; you can redistribute it and/or > .\" modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as > .\" published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of > .\" the License, or (at your option) any later version. > .\" > .\" The GNU General Public License's references to "object code" > .\" and "executables" are to be interpreted as the output of any > .\" document formatting or typesetting system, including > .\" intermediate and printed output. > .\" > .\" This manual is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > .\" but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > .\" MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > .\" GNU General Public License for more details. > .\" > .\" You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public > .\" License along with this manual. If not, see > .\" <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. > .\" > .de URL > \\$2 \(laURL: \\$1 \(ra\\$3 > .. > .if \n[.g] .mso www.tmac > .TH RICHACL 7 2015-09-01 "Linux" "Rich Access Control Lists" > .SH NAME > richacl \- Rich Access Control Lists > .SH DESCRIPTION > Rich Access Control Lists (RichACLs) are an extension of the POSIX file > permission model (see > .BR acl (5)) > to support > .URL https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5661.txt "NFSv4 Access Control Lists" > on local and remote-mounted filesystems. > > A RichACL can always be translated into an equivalent NFSv4 ACL which grants > the same permissions. > > RichACLs can be enabled on supported local filesystems (currently, ext4 and > XFS). The in-kernel NFSv4 server and client also include RichACL support. > > Enabling RichACLs disables POSIX Access Control Lists; the two ACL models > cannot coexist on the same filesystem. > > When used on a filesystem that does not support RichACLs, the > .BR getrichacl (1) > and > .BR setrichacl (1) > utilities will operate on the file permission bits instead: > .BR getrichacl (1) > will display the file permission bits as a RichACL; when a RichACL > is set with > .BR setrichacl (1) > which can be represented exactly by the file permission bits, > .BR setrichacl (1) > will set the file permission bits instead. An attempt to set a RichACL that > cannot be represented exactly by the file permission bits results in an error. > > .SS Structure of RichACLs > > RichACLs consist of a number of ACL entries, three file masks, and a set of > flags specifying attributes of the ACL as a whole (by contrast with the > per-ACL-entry flags described below). > > Each of the ACL entries allows or denies some permissions to a particular user, > group, or special identifier. An ACL entry consists of four fields: > > .IP \(bu 2 > A tag which specifies the user, group, or special identifier the entry applies > to. Special identifiers can be the file owner > .RB ( owner@ ), > the owning group > .RB ( group@ ), > or everyone > .RB ( everyone@ ). > .IP \(bu > A set of permissions the entry allows or denies. > .IP \(bu > A set of flags that indicate whether the user or group identifier is mapped or > unmapped, and whether the entry has been and can be inherited. > .IP \(bu > A type field indicating whether the entry allows or denies the permissions > specified in the second field. > .PP > The owner, group, and other file masks further control which permissions the > ACL grants, subject to the > .BR masked "\ (" m ) > and > .BR write_through "\ (" w ) > ACL flags: when the permissions of a file or directory are changed with > .BR chmod (2), > the file masks are set based on the new file mode, and the > .B masked > and > .B write_through > ACL flags are set. Likewise, when a new file or directory inherits an ACL from > its parent directory, the file masks are set to the intersection between the > permissions granted by the inherited ACL and the > .I mode > parameter as given to > .BR open "(2), " mkdir (2), > and similar, and the > .B masked > ACL flag is set. In both cases, the file masks limit the permissions that the > ACL will grant. > > The purpose of the file masks is to allow traditional POSIX applications which > are unaware of RichACLs to place limits on the permissions granted by the > RichACL without causing the ACL entries to be modified. Without the file mask, > the only alternative would be for the kernel to directly modify the ACL > entries. However, this latter approach could have a "hysteresis effect", > whereby a RichACL-unaware application that performs a transition from one file > mode to another file mode and then back to the original file mode could cause > destruction of the permission information in ACL entries. When creating files > or directories, the > .I mode > parameter to > .BR open "(2), " mkdir (2), > and similar would cause the same effect. s/cause/have/ > > Note that entries with the identifier > .B everyone@ > apply to all processes, whereas the \(lqother\(rq file permissions and > \(lqother\(rq entries in POSIX ACLs apply to all processes which are not the So, I still think it's helpful to mention ACL_OTHER here. How about: s/\\(lqother\\(rq/\\(lqother\\(rq (\\fBACL_OTHER\\fP)/ > owner, are not in the owning group, and do not match a user or group mentioned > in the ACL. > > Unlike POSIX ACLs, RichACLs do not have separate \(lqaccess\(rq ACLs that > define the access permissions and \(lqdefault\(rq ACLs that define the > inheritable permissions. Instead, flags on each ACL entry determine whether > the entry is effective during access checks and/or inheritable. > > > .SS ACL flags > > The following ACL flags are defined: > > .TP > .BR masked "\ (" m ) > When set, the file masks define upper limits on the permissions the ACL may > grant. When not set, the file masks are ignored. > .TP > .BR write_through "\ (" w ) > When this flag and the > .B masked > flag are both set, the owner and other file masks define the actual permissions > granted to the file owner and to others instead of defining an upper limit. > When the > .B masked > flag is not set, the > .B write_through > flag has no effect. > .TP > .BR auto_inherit "\ (" a ) > Automatic Inheritance is enabled. See > .IR "Automatic Inheritance" . > .TP > .BR protected "\ (" p ) > The ACL is protected from modification by Automatic > Inheritance. > .TP > .BR defaulted "\ (" d ) > Indicates that the ACL has been assigned in an application-dependent way when > the file or directory was created; it has neither been inherited nor set > explicitly. ACLs of files created on Linux will never have the > .B defaulted > flag set, but the flag may be set on files created on or copied over from > other operating systems. When this flag is set for an ACL, Automatic > Inheritance will completely replace the ACL. > > .SS ACL entry flags > > The following flags on ACL entries are defined: > > .TP > .BR file_inherit "\ (" f ) > When this flag appears in the ACL entry of a directory, then: > .RS > .IP \(bu 2 > That entry is inherited by new files created in the directory such that the > permissions of the entry apply to the file (the inheritance flags of the > inherited entry are cleared). > .IP \(bu > The entry is is inherited by new subdirectories created in the directory such > that the permissions of the entry will apply to new files created in the > subdirectory. > .RE > .TP > .BR dir_inherit "\ (" d ) > When this flag appears in the ACL entry of a directory, then that entry is > inherited by new subdirectories created in the directory such that the > permissions of the entry apply to the subdirectory (the > .B inherit_only > flag is cleared). > .TP > .BR no_propagate "\ (" n ) > Inheritance stops at the next subdirectory level. When a file or directory > inherits an entry that has this flag set, the > .BR file_inherit ", " dir_inherit ", " no_propagate ", and " inherit_only > flags are cleared. > .TP > .BR inherit_only "\ (" i ) > The entry defines inheritable permissions only and is ignored for access > checking. When a file or directory inherits an entry that has this flag set, > the flag is cleared. > .TP > .BR inherited "\ (" a ) > The entry has been automatically inherited from the parent directory. > .TP > .BR unmapped "\ (" u ) > The user or group identifier is a textual string and is not mapped to a numeric > user or group identifier. ACLs with unmapped identifiers can occur on NFSv4 > mounted filesystems when the client cannot determine numeric user or group > identifiers for some of the NFSv4 user@domain or group@domain who values. They > cannot be assigned to local files or directories. > > .SS Permissions > > The following permissions are defined for RichACL entries and for the three > file masks: > > .TP > .BR read_data " / " list_directory "\ (" r ) > For a file: read the data of the file. > For a directory: list the contents of the directory. > .TP > .BR write_data " / " add_file "\ (" w ) > For a file: modify the data of the file; does not include opening the file in > append mode. > For a directory: add a new file in the directory. > .TP > .BR append_data " / " add_subdirectory "\ (" p ) > For a file: open the file in append mode. > For a directory: create a subdirectory in the directory. > .TP > .BR execute "\ (" x ) > For a file: execute the file. > For a directory: traverse (search) the directory. > .TP > .BR delete_child "\ (" d ) > Delete a file or directory within a directory. This permission is meaningful > only for directories. > .TP > .BR delete "\ (" D ) > Delete the file or directory. > .TP > .BR read_attributes "\ (" a ) > Read basic attributes of a file or directory (see > .BR stat (2)). > This permission is defined by NFSv4. It is stored, but ignored. Reading basic > attributes of files and directories is always allowed on Linux. > .TP > .BR write_attributes "\ (" A ) > Change the times associated with a file or directory to an arbitrary value. > This permission is always implicitly granted to the file owner. > .TP > .BR read_acl "\ (" c ) > Read the ACL of a file or directory. Like reading the basic file attributes (the > .B read_attributes > permission), reading ACLs is always allowed in Linux. > .TP > .BR write_acl "\ (" C ) > Change the ACL or file mode of a file or directory. > .TP > .BR write_owner "\ (" o ) > Take ownership of a file or directory. Change the owning group of a file or > directory to a group of which the calling process is a member. > .TP > .ad l > .BR read_named_attrs "\ (" R "), " write_named_attrs "\ (" W "), " synchronize "\ (" S "), " write_retention "\ (" e "), " write_retention_hold "\ (" E ) > .ad > These permissions are defined by NFSv4 and NFSv4.1. They are stored, but ignored. > .PP > For the > .BR r ", " w ", and " p > permissions, which have different long forms for files and directories, the > .BR getrichacl (1) > utility will output the appropriate form(s) depending on the context. > The > .BR setrichacl (1) > utility will accept either form for any file type. > > .SS Text form > The common textual representation of a RichACL consists of the colon-separated > fields of the ACL flags, file masks, and ACL entries in the following > format: > .TP > \fBflags:\fR\fIacl_flags\fR > The ACL flags. > .TP > \fBowner:\fR\fIperm\fR\fB::mask\fR, \fBgroup:\fR\fIperm\fR\fB::mask\fR, \fBother:\fR\fIperm\fR\fB::mask\fR > The file masks and their permissions. > .TP > \fIwho\fR\fB:\fR\fIperm\fR\fB:\fR\fIflags\fR\fB:allow\fR, \fIwho\fR\fB:\fR\fIperm\fR\fB:\fR\fIflags\fR\fB:deny\fR > For each ACL entry, who the entry applies to, the permissions of the entry, the > entry flags, and the entry type. The \fIwho\fR field is one of the following: > .RS > .IP \(bu 2 > One of the special identifiers: > .BR owner@ ", " group@ ", or " everyone@ , > .IP \(bu > A > .BR user: " or " u: > prefix followed by a user name or user ID that designates a specific user, > .IP \(bu > A > .BR group: " or " g: > prefix followed by a group name or group ID that designates a specific group. > .RE > .PP > The entries are comma, whitespace, or newline separated. s/entries/fields of an ACL entry/ (?) > > Flags and permissions have single-letter as well as long forms, as listed under > .IR "ACL flags" , > .IR "ACL entry flags" , > and > .IR Permissions . > When the single-letter forms are used, the flags or permissions are > concatenated. When the long forms are used, the flags or permissions are > separated by slashes. To align permissions or flags vertically, dashes can be > used for padding. > > .SS Setting and modifying file permissions > The access permissions for a file can either be set by assigning an Access > Control List > .RB ( setrichacl (1)) > or by changing the file mode permission bits > .RB ( chmod (1)). > In addition, a file can inherit an ACL from its parent directory at creation > time as described under > .IR "Permissions at file-creation time" . > > .SS Assigning an Access Control List > When assigning an ACL to a file, unless explicitly specified, the owner, group, > and other file masks will be computed from the ACL entries as described in > the section > .IR "Computing the maximum file masks" . > The owner, group, and other file mode permission bits are then each set from > the owner, group, and other file mask as follows: > .IP \(bu 2 > If the file mask includes the > .B r > permission, the read > file mode permission bit will be set. > .IP \(bu > If the file mask includes the > .B w > or > .B p > permission, the write file mode permission bit will be set. > .IP \(bu > If the file mask includes the > .B x > permission, the execute file mode permission bit will be set. > .PP > If the ACL can be represented exactly by the file mode permission bits, the > file permission bits are set to match the ACL and no ACL is stored. (When the > ACL of a file is requested which doesn't have an ACL, the file mode permission > bits are converted into an equivalent ACL.) > > .SS Changing the file mode permission bits > When changing the file mode permission bits with > .BR chmod (1), > the owner, group, and other file permission bits are set to the permission bits > in the new mode, and the owner, group, and other file masks are set based on > the new mode bits as follows: > .IP \(bu 2 > If the read bit in a set of permissions is set, the > .B r > permission in the corresponding file mask will be set. > .IP \(bu > If the write bit in a set of permissions is set, the > .B w > and > .B p > permissions in the corresponding file mask will be set. > .IP \(bu > If the execute bit in a set of permissions is set, the > .B x > permission in the corresponding file mask will be set. > .PP > In addition, the > .B masked > and > .B write_through > ACL flags are set. This has the > effect of limiting the permissions granted by the ACL to the file mode > permission bits; in addition, the owner is granted the owner mode bits and > others are granted the other mode bits. If the > .B auto_inherit > flag is set, the > .B protected > flag is also set to prevent the Automatic Inheritance algorithm from modifying > the ACL. > > .SS Permissions at file-creation time > When a directory has any inheritable ACL entries, the following > happens when a file or directory is created inside that directory: > .RS 4 Remove preceding line. > .IP 1. 4 > A file created inside that directory will inherit all of the ACL entries that > have the > .B file_inherit > flag set, and all inheritance-related flags in the inherited entries flag will > be cleared. > > A subdirectory created inside that directory will inherit all of the ACL > entries that either have the > .B dir_inherit > flag set, or the > .B file_inherit > flag set and the > .B no_propagate > flag not set. Entries whose > .B dir_inherit > flag is set will have their > .B inherit_only > flag cleared, and entries whose > .B dir_inherit > flag is not set will have their > .B inherit_only > flag set. Finally, entries whose > .B no_propagate > flag is set will have all inheritance-related flags cleared. > .IP 2. > If the parent directory's ACL has the > .B auto_inherit > flag set, the inherited ACL will have its s/the/then the/ (For ease of parsing) > .B auto_inherit > flag set, and all entries will have their > .B inherited > flag set. Otherwise, the > .B auto_inherit > and > .B inherited > flags are cleared. > .IP 3. > The three file masks are computed from the inherited ACL as described in > the section > .IR "Computing the maximum file masks" . > .IP 4. > The three sets of permissions for the owner, the group, and for others in > the \fImode\fR parameter as given to > .BR open (2), > .BR mkdir (2), > and similar are converted into sets of RichACL permissions. The correspondence > between mask flags and RichACL permission bits is described in the section > .IR "Changing the file mode permission bits" . > Any RichACL permissions not included in those sets are > removed from the owner, group, and other file masks. The file mode permission > bits are then computed from the file masks as described in the section > .IR "Assigning an Access Control List" . > The process umask (see > .BR umask (2)) > is ignored. > .IP 5. > The > .B masked > ACL flag is set. The > .B write_through > ACL flag remains cleared. In addition, if the > .B auto_inherit > flag of the inherited ACL is set, the > .B protected > flag is also set to prevent the Automatic Inheritance algorithm from modifying > the ACL. > .RE Remove preceding line. > .PP > When a directory does not have inheritable ACL entries, files and directories > created inside that directory will not be assigned Access Control Lists and the > file mode permission bits will be set to (\fImode\fR\ &\ ~\fIumask\fR) where > \fImode\fR is the mode argument of the relevant system call and \fIumask\fR is > the process umask (see > .BR umask (2)). > > .SS Automatic Inheritance > Automatic Inheritance is a mechanism that allows permission changes to > propagate from a directory to files and subdirectories inside that directory, > recursively. Propagation is carried out by the process changing the directory > permissions (usually, > .BR setrichacl (1)); > it happens without user intervention albeit not entirely automatically. > > A significant limitation is that this mechanism works only as long as files s/limitation/limitation of the Automatic Inheritance feature/ > are created without explicitly specifying the file permissions to use. The > standard system calls for creating files and directories > .RB ( creat (2), > .BR open (2), > .BR mkdir (2), > .BR mknod (2)) s/)$/,\nand so on)/ (And, I'd drop creat(2) from that list of examples. It's ancient and obsolete; no need to encourageits use.) > all have mandatory mode parameters which define the maximum allowed permissions > of the new files. To take account of this restriction, the > .B protected > ACL flag must be set if the > .B inherited > flag is set. This effectively disables Automatic Inheritance for that > particular file. > > Notwithstanding the aforementioned limitation, Automatic Inheritance still > remains useful for network protocols like NFSv4 and SMB, which both support > creating files and directories without defining their permissions. These > protocols can implement those operations by using the standard system calls and > by then undoing the effect of applying the mode parameters. > > When the ACL of a directory is changed, the following happens for each entry > (\(lqchild\(rq) inside that directory: > .IP 1. 4 > If the entry is a symbolic link, skip the child. > .IP 2. > If the > .B auto_inherit > flag of the entry's ACL is not set or the > .B protected > flag is set, skip the child. > .IP 3. > With the child's ACL: > .RS 4 > .IP a) 4 > If the > .B defaulted > flag is set, replace the ACL with an empty ACL > with the > .B auto_inherit > flag set. > .IP b) > Delete all entries which have the > .B inherited > flag set. > .IP c) > Append all entries inherited from the parent directory according to step 1 of > the algorithm described under > .IR "Permissions at file-creation time". > Set the > .B inherited > flag of each of these entries. > .IP d) > Recompute the file masks. At th end of the last section, add: as descibed in the section "...." > .RE > .IP 4. > If the child is a directory, recursively apply this algorithm. > > .SS Access check algorithm > > When a process requests a particular kind of access (expressed as a set of > RichACL permissions) to a file, the following algorithm determines whether the > access is granted or denied: > > .IP 1. 4 > If the > .B masked > ACL flag is set, then: > .RS 4 > .IP a) 4 > If the > .B write_through > ACL flag is set, then: > .RS 4 > .IP \(bu 2 > If the requesting process is the file owner, then access is granted if the > owner mask includes the requested permissions, and is otherwise denied. > .IP \(bu > If the requesting process is not the file owner and it is in the owning group or matches any ACL entries other than > .BR everyone@ , > proceed to step b). > .IP \(bu > If the requesting process is not the file owner, is not in the owning group, > and no ACL entries other than > .B everyone@ > match the process, then access is granted if the other mask includes the > requested permissions, and is otherwise denied. > .RE > .IP b) > If any of the following is true: > .RS 4 > .IP \(bu 2 > the requesting process is the file owner and the owner mask does not include all > requested permissions, > .IP \(bu > the requesting process is not the file owner and it is in the owning group or > matches any ACL entries other than > .BR everyone@ , > and the group mask does not include all requested permissions, > .IP \(bu > the requesting process is not the file owner, not in the owning group, it > matches no ACL entries other than > .BR everyone@ , > and the other mask does not include all requested permissions, > .PP > then access is denied. > .RE > .RE > .IP 2. > Upon reaching this point, the determination of whether or not access is granted > is made by scanning all ACL entries to see if one or more applicable entries > together grant a cumulative set of permissions that matches the requested > permissions or there is an applicable entry that explicitly denies one or more > of the requested permissions. The scan of all ACL entries begins by first > initializing the set of remaining permissions (i.e., those that have not yet > been satisfied during the scan) to be the set of requested permissions. Then > the ACL entries are scanned > .IR "in order" , > and for each entry: > .RS 4 > .IP a) 4 > If the > .B inherit_only > or > .B unmapped > flags are set, continue with the next ACL entry. > .IP b) > If any of the following is true: > .RS 4 > .IP \(bu 2 > the entry's identifier is > .B owner@ > and the requesting process is the file owner, > .IP \(bu > the entry's identifier is > .B group@ > and the requesting process is in the owning group, > .IP \(bu > the entry's identifier is a user and the requesting process is owned by that > user, > .IP \(bu > the entry's identifier is a group and the requesting process is a member in > that group, > .IP \(bu > the entry's identifier is > .BR everyone@ , > .PP > then the entry matches the process; proceed to the next step. Otherwise, > continue with the next ACL entry. > .RE > .IP c) > If the entry denies any of the remaining permissions, access is denied. > .IP d) > If the entry allows any of the remaining permissions, then: > .RS 4 > .IP \(bu 2 > If the > .B masked > ACL flag is set and the entry's identifier is not > .B owner@ > or > .BR everyone@ > or is a user entry matching the file owner, remove all permissions from the > remaining permissions which are both allowed by the entry and included in the > group mask, > .IP \(bu > Otherwise, remove all permissions from the remaining permissions which are > allowed by the entry. > .RE > .RE > .IP 3. > If there are no more remaining permissions, access is allowed. Otherwise, > access is denied. > .PP > In this algorithm, a process can gain the permissions it requires by > accumulating them from multiple RichACL entries. This is in contrast with > POSIX ACLs, where access is only granted if an ACL entry exists that matches > the requesting process and includes all the requested permissions. > > .SS Computing the maximum file masks > When setting an ACL and no file masks have been explicitly specified and when > inheriting an ACL from the parent directory, the following algorithm is used s/directory/directory (as described in section "....")/ > for computing the file masks: > > .IP 1. 4 > Clear the owner, group, and other file masks. Remember which permissions have > already been processed (initially, the empty set). > .IP 2. > For each ACL entry: > .RS 4 > .IP \(bu 2 > If the > .B inherit_only > flag is set, skip the entry. > .IP \(bu > Otherwise, compute which permissions the entry allows or denies that have not > been processed yet (the remaining permissions). > .IP \(bu > If the entry is an > .B owner@ > entry, add the remaining permissions to the owner mask for > .B allow > entries, and remove the remaining permissions from the owner mask for > .B deny > entries. > .IP \(bu > Otherwise, if the entry is an > .B everyone@ > entry, proceed as with > .B owner@ > entries but add or remove the remaining permissions from the owner, group, and > other file masks. > .IP \(bu > Otherwise, proceed as with > .B owner@ > entries but add or remove the remaining permissions from the owner and group > file masks. > .IP \(bu > Add the entry's permissions to the processed permissions. > .RE > .PP > The resulting file masks represent the ACL as closely as possible. With these > file masks, the effective permissions that the ACL grants will be the same when > the > .B masked > flag is set as when it is not set. > > .\" .SH BUGS > .SH AUTHOR > Written by Andreas Grünbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx>. > > Please send your bug reports, suggested features and comments to the above address. > > .SH CONFORMING TO > Rich Access Control Lists are Linux-specific. > .SH SEE ALSO > .BR chmod (1), > .BR getrichacl (1), > .BR ls (1), > .BR setrichacl (1) > .BR stat (2), > .BR umask (2), > .BR acl (5) > .\" librichacl So, in terms of actually testing this stuff, is it just a matter of applying your patch series to the kernel, building the kernel, pulling the RichACL user-space tools from Git, and mount(8)ing a filesystem with the right option? Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
