Re: [PATCH 1/3] generic/304: fix high offset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:46:14PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> "Invalid argument" is a better response to an impossibly high offset
>> dedupe request than "extents don't match", so change the test.
>
> What does btrfs return here?

-EINVAL, so this makes the test pass on btrfs.

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Filipe David Manana,

"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
 Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
 That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs



[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux