On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:22:31AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 02:52:53PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 03:40:37PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > Check that we don't expose old disk contents when a directio write to
> > > an unwritten extent fails due to IO errors. This primarily affects
> > > XFS and ext4.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > aiocp.c: In function 'main':
> > aiocp.c:407:1: warning: format '%d' expects argument of type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'off_t' [-Wformat=]
> > printf("tocopy=%d len=%d blk=%d\n", tocopy, length, aio_blksize);
> > ^
> >
> > Followup patch is fine, I'll commit as is.
>
> Dave, given that Darrick's patches is going to cause more
> _scratch_mount occurences, how quickly do you plan to commit his
> patchset? Should I wait until he makes his change before I do the
> s/_scratch_mount/_scratch_cycle_mount/ change? Should I make that
> change, and let you fix it up the commit?
I had to head out suddenly yestrday afternoon, just after I sent
above email. Only just got back in front of the computer, so I'll be
pushing it out once the new pull has run through a sanity check.
If you can respin the patch once I've done that, it would be greatly
appreciated.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
