Seems like only 4 patches made it through.. On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:47:15PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Hi folks, > > This is the 4th version of this series to followup on review > comments from Brian and Christoph. There are three new patches in > this series. Patch 2/8 is split out from patch 3/8 to document the > removal of the ioend cancelling code, spearate from the introduction > of the writepage context. Patches 7 and 8 are new patches (as in the > first time I've posted them) to demonstrate how to remove the IO > completion dependency on recording the bufferehads attached to the > ioend. This is the first step in removing bufferheads from the > writepage IO path - these are FYI patches, not patches I want to > have committed immediately. > > The changes all run through xfstests on 4k and 1k block size > filesystems fine, and I think i addressed all the review comments. > Patch 6/8 changed enough that I removed Brian's reviewed-by from it > and so it will need to be looked at completely again. > > -Dave. > > Version 4: > - split xfs_ioend_cancel removal into it's own patch (patch 2) > - cleaned up submission of ioends to be consistent w.r.t. success > and error paths (patch 3) > - made variables names less verbose (patch 6) > - got rid of xfs_writepage_submit() (patch 6) > - use a struct list_head for ioend chaining (patch 6) > - consolidated ioend submission paths to use common code (patch 6) > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ---end quoted text--- _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
