On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 05:39:41AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Removing xfs_cancel_ioend and replacing it with the start and cancel > writeback scheme that we currently only use for > xfs_setfilesize_trans_alloc failures actually seems to be the biggest > change in this patch and is entirely undocumented. Any chance you > could split this into a prep patch and properly document it? I can try. > > - > > - if (!ioend || need_ioend || type != ioend->io_type) { > > - xfs_ioend_t *previous = *result; > > - > > - ioend = xfs_alloc_ioend(inode, type); > > - ioend->io_offset = offset; > > - ioend->io_buffer_head = bh; > > - ioend->io_buffer_tail = bh; > > - if (previous) > > - previous->io_list = ioend; > > - *result = ioend; > > + if (!wpc->ioend || wpc->io_type != wpc->ioend->io_type || > > + bh->b_blocknr != wpc->last_block + 1) { > > We now start a new ioend if the blocks aren't contiguous, which seems > reasonable. But this also means the similar check in xfs_submit_ioend > should be removed at the same time. OK. -Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs