This series solves the assert and the follow-up XFS warning for me. Tested-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> The lockdep splat is still there, but I assume you know that. On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi folks, > > This is a followup to Eric's patch that attempted to fix the assert > failure that Ross reported. I'd mentioned I'd looked at this > recently, because xfs/090 was triggering the same failure when > configured with a RT device. This series fixes the original locking > based assert failures, followed by the issues that fixing the > original assert uncovered. This now results in xfs/090 failing > because of xfs_db check problem (repair is clean) but it (and other > tests) no longer assert fail. > > Cheers, > > Dave. > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
