On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:21:45PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote: > It looks like the current version of xfsprogs (v4.3.0) has an inconsistency > between its documentation and implementation that is making the xfstest > xfs/293 fail: > > ./check xfs/293 > FSTYP -- xfs (debug) > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 lorwyn 4.5.0-rc1 > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/pmem0p2 > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o dax -o context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 /dev/pmem0p2 /mnt/xfstests_scratch > > xfs/293 - output mismatch (see /root/xfstests/results//xfs/293.out.bad) > --- tests/xfs/293.out 2015-10-02 10:19:36.836796097 -0600 > +++ /root/xfstests/results//xfs/293.out.bad 2016-01-29 10:41:25.530512911 -0700 > @@ -1,2 +1,4 @@ > QA output created by 293 > Silence is golden > +help not documented in the xfs_io manpage > +zero not documented in the xfs_io manpage > ... > (Run 'diff -u tests/xfs/293.out /root/xfstests/results//xfs/293.out.bad' to see the entire diff) > Ran: xfs/293 > Failures: xfs/293 > Failed 1 of 1 tests > > "help" and "zero" are indeed options in xfs_io, but aren't listed in the man > page. Commit 270dae6c0b41d855729fec73f94f33665bd36349 in xfsprogs for-next fixes this. --D > > Thanks, > - Ross > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
