On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:05:00AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Since the checksum function and the field are both __le32, don't
> perform endian conversion when comparing the two. This fixes mount
> failures on ppc64 in 4.5-rc1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
So somehow this first got munged in commit:
b94fb2d1 xfs: refactor and open code log record crc check
... which was intended to only be a refactoring patch. Instead, it
removes the following line:
- if (crc != rhead->h_crc) {
... and replaces it with:
+ if (crc != le32_to_cpu(rhead->h_crc)) {
No idea how that happened. Maybe I was just looking at the log message
code and had a thinko. Anyways, it was followed up with commit:
6528250b xfs: support a crc verification only log record pass
... which adds the code you've fixed here and probably just copied the
busted check.
> fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> index ac80f39..52dd946 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> @@ -4502,7 +4502,7 @@ xlog_recover_process(
> * know precisely what failed.
> */
> if (pass == XLOG_RECOVER_CRCPASS) {
> - if (rhead->h_crc && crc != le32_to_cpu(rhead->h_crc))
> + if (rhead->h_crc && crc != rhead->h_crc)
> return -EFSBADCRC;
> return 0;
> }
There's another check a few lines after this that is also broken, based
on the first commit referenced above. Do you want me to send a v2 patch
or would you like to? I'll run some ppc64 testing either way...
Brian
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
