On 1/26/16 6:57 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 22-01-16 12:25:31, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Q_XGETNEXTQUOTA is exactly like Q_XGETQUOTA, except that it
>> will return quota information for the id equal to or greater
>> than the id requested. In other words, if the requested id has
>> no quota, the command will return quota information for the
>> next higher id which does have a quota set. If no higher id
>> has an active quota, -ESRCH is returned.
>
> Actually, is -ESRCH the right return value? It seems XFS traditionally
> returns -ENOENT when id doesn't exist. So that would look more logical to
> me.
Hm, I was just going by the quotactl manpage, TBH, which says:
ESRCH No disc quota is found for the indicated user.
But yes, you are right, it is ENOENT for xfs... argh. I suppose the
quotactl manpage could use an update as well, then.
At this point do you want me to update the patches & resend or do you
want to fix that up too? :( I reference -ESRCH in comments too, I think.
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
