On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 05:09:23PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Pull another 4 bytes out of the xfs_icdinode. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c | 8 ++++---- > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.h | 1 - > fs/xfs/xfs_export.c | 2 +- > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 5 +---- > fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c | 2 +- > fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 2 +- > fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 1 - > fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c | 2 +- > 8 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > ... > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c > index c424d4b..397ce85 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c > @@ -1227,7 +1227,6 @@ xfs_setup_inode( > break; > } > > - inode->i_generation = ip->i_d.di_gen; > i_size_write(inode, ip->i_d.di_size); > xfs_diflags_to_iflags(inode, ip); > Same question here wrt to reclaimable inodes as the previous patch and nlink..? Seems Ok otherwise. Brian > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c > index cfb6527..6162e65 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c > @@ -100,11 +100,11 @@ xfs_bulkstat_one_int( > buf->bs_mtime.tv_nsec = inode->i_mtime.tv_nsec; > buf->bs_ctime.tv_sec = inode->i_ctime.tv_sec; > buf->bs_ctime.tv_nsec = inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec; > + buf->bs_gen = inode->i_generation; > > buf->bs_xflags = xfs_ip2xflags(ip); > buf->bs_extsize = dic->di_extsize << mp->m_sb.sb_blocklog; > buf->bs_extents = dic->di_nextents; > - buf->bs_gen = dic->di_gen; > memset(buf->bs_pad, 0, sizeof(buf->bs_pad)); > buf->bs_dmevmask = dic->di_dmevmask; > buf->bs_dmstate = dic->di_dmstate; > -- > 2.5.0 > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
