On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:46:40PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:02:36AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > > As I've pointed out previously to Darrick: xfstests:/tests/xfs/122 > > > > > > Make that build again, update it. > > > > > Oh, I went looking for that and missed it somehow, thought it had been removed. Ok then! > > The real issue is that build environment change alignments. 32 vs 64 > bit builds are obvious, but on some architectures different ABIs have > different alignments (we had some fun with ARM in that regard), > nevermind the equivalents to IRIX n32 popping up everywhere these days > that make things complicated. > > I'd really love to have Darrick's check in xfs_format.h as an opt-in > if a build time assert is provided - that way every user can check it > doesn't screw up the structures. I've fixed xfs/122, so I suppose we no longer need this to end up in xfsprogs. The kernel-side patch can stick around in fs/xfs/ without touching libxfs. (New patches out soonish.) --D > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
