Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 06:09:38PM +0100, Felix Janda wrote: > > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > I think we're having a deeper issue here. For an LFS build we > > > absolutely should have these values as the kernel dirent64 has them. > > > > > > Either we manage to not pull in the LFS version of readdir/getdents > > > or musl is doing something inredibly stupid. Can you investigate if > > > and why we're not using the LFS getdents64 here? > > > > With musl you always have LFS. However still musl does not define the > > _DIRENT_HAVE_*. You can see the full dirent.h at: > > > > http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/include/dirent.h > > > > I will ask on the musl list whether these constants can be added. So > > you can disregard this patch. > > Oh, ok. That's a little weird, but I guess working around that > with a new autoconf test is fine. Actually, it should also be useful for other systems. For example, on FreeBSD dirent has d_type (but does not declare _DIRENT_HAVE_D_TYPE), but currently dump_dirent() does not print it. Felix _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
