On 01/09/2016 06:56 PM, Mike Christie wrote: > On 01/09/2016 07:37 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Seems like this is missing REQ_OP_FLUSH, which still hides as a write? >> Oh yeah, to answer the second part of your question, REQ_OP_FLUSH is only a flush operation like what request_fn drivers wanted. REQ_PREFLUSH can be set with a REQ_OP_WRITE bio when filesystems want to do both. There is then the case where filesystems and blkdev_issue_flush could just want to request a flush. I left them as a REQ_PREFLUSH with REQ_OP_WRITE set, so there would be a single code path. > > I might have misunderstood what you wanted or am misunderstanding you now. > > I did not change the flush related code until the last patches. I added > REQ_OP_FLUSH in patch: > > [PATCH 33/35] block, drivers: add REQ_OP_FLUSH operation > commit 18dea20363ba245a47bc1bb54f6465b8a05b19af > Author: Mike Christie <mchristi@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue Jan 5 21:02:17 2016 -0600 > > block, drivers: add REQ_OP_FLUSH operation > > > and I added the REQ_PREFLUSH flag in > > > [PATCH 35/35] block, drivers, fs: rename REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH > commit 303dc6a7cc3673065538ba041562fcd833a619af > Author: Mike Christie <mchristi@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu Jan 7 18:17:03 2016 -0600 > > block, drivers, fs: rename REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH > > > I did them in separate patches, because I was not sure if they were > correct with what you requested before, and because they were a little > more tricky because of how request_fn drivers, make_request_fn drivers, > and dm-multipath handle flushes differently. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
