On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 12:56:55AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Because struct xfs_agfl is 36 bytes long and has a 64-bit integer > inside it, gcc will quietly round the structure size up to the nearest > 64 bits -- in this case, 40 bytes. This results in the XFS_AGFL_SIZE > macro returning incorrect results for v5 filesystems on 64-bit > machines (118 items instead of 119). As a result, a 32-bit xfs_repair > will see garbage in AGFL item 119 and complain. > > Therefore, tell gcc not to pad the structure so that the AGFL size > calculation is correct. Do you have a testcase for this? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
