On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 04:39:01PM +0530, Vivek Trivedi wrote: > Fix unintentional integer overflow in xlog_find_verify_cycle. > Reported by coverity. xfs_daddr_t is a 64-bit integer. How does replacing it with an int fix overlows? xlog_find_verify_cycle originates in the kernel code, so any fix should probably be done there first. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
