On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 03:33:20PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 07:22:52AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Yes, I saw that. So so far I'd suggest something like the following > > for btrfs: > > > > - return EBADFD for missing read/wite permissions > > Yowwwch... What the hell does that have to do with STREAMS? Or are you > using EBADFD as "nobody uses that error value anyway, let's assign it > whatever meaning we need"? > > Besides, that'll be confused with EBADF all the time. I strongly > recommend against that. Yes, I meant EBADF. That's what we normally use for missing FMODE_READ/WRITE or fget failures, so why would this call be different from everything else? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs