On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 10:12:57PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > * I don't have any interesting NFS/CIFS setups for test. :( I have a banrch with client and server support for NFSv4.2 CLONE support: http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/pnfs.git/shortlog/refs/heads/reflink+clone For now you want to use btrfs on the server, as using reflinks on XFS seems to be a little unstable over NFS. > If you're going to start using this mess, you probably ought to just > pull from my github trees for kernel[1], xfsprogs[2], and xfstests[3]. > They should just work with the btrfs that's in 4.3. > > Comments and questions are, as always, welcome. Any reason the groups are called clone? I don't really have an opinion on clone vs reflink but given that the xfs_io command is reflink I'd rather be consistent. Otherwise I'd say get it merged ASAP, we can still fix up various details later. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
