Hi, Dave,
Thank you very much. I got some results:
# xfs_db -xr /dev/sda4
xfs_db> convert agno 1 agino 78272 ino
0x800131c0 (2147561920)
xfs_db> inode 2147561920
xfs_db> p
core.magic = 0x494e
core.mode = 0100600
core.version = 2
core.format = 2 (extents)
core.nlinkv2 = 0
core._onlink_ = 0
core.projid_lo = 26286
core.projid_hi = 0
core.uid = 30000
core.gid = 100
core.flushiter = 30
core.atime.sec = Tue Oct 20 13:51:58 2015
core.atime.nsec = 104938956
core.mtime.sec = Tue Oct 20 13:53:58 2015
core.mtime.nsec = 824941455
core.ctime.sec = Tue Oct 20 14:21:59 2015
core.ctime.nsec = 062660227
core.size = 41041920
core.nblocks = 10020
core.extsize = 0
core.nextents = 2
core.naextents = 0
core.forkoff = 0
core.aformat = 2 (extents)
core.dmevmask = 0
core.dmstate = 0
core.newrtbm = 0
core.prealloc = 0
core.realtime = 0
core.immutable = 0
core.append = 0
core.sync = 0
core.noatime = 0
core.nodump = 0
core.rtinherit = 0
core.projinherit = 1
core.nosymlinks = 0
core.extsz = 0
core.extszinherit = 0
core.nodefrag = 0
core.filestream = 0
core.gen = 1194777008
next_unlinked = 75712
u.bmx[0-1] = [startoff,startblock,blockcount,extentflag] 0:[0,135330882,32,0] 1:[32,146117410,9988,0]
However, I want to ask how this situation to happen?
From the output, we can see "core.nlinkv2 = 0". But I can't reapper this:
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/data/test.data bs=4k count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
4194304 bytes (4.2 MB) copied, 0.00476946 s, 879 MB/s
# stat /data/test.data
File: `/data/test.data'
Size: 4194304 Blocks: 8192 IO Block: 4096 regular file
Device: 804h/2052d Inode: 29409295 Links: 1
Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root)
Access: 2015-10-21 16:05:45.201679018 +0800
Modify: 2015-10-21 16:05:45.205679018 +0800
Change: 2015-10-21 16:05:45.205679018 +0800
# xfs_db -xr -c 'inode 29409295' -c p /dev/sda4
core.magic = 0x494e
core.mode = 0100644
core.version = 2
core.format = 2 (extents)
core.nlinkv2 = 1
core._onlink_ = 0
core.projid_lo = 0
core.projid_hi = 0
core.uid = 0
core.gid = 0
core.flushiter = 12
core.atime.sec = Wed Oct 21 16:05:45 2015
core.atime.nsec = 201679018
core.mtime.sec = Wed Oct 21 16:05:45 2015
core.mtime.nsec = 205679018
core.ctime.sec = Wed Oct 21 16:05:45 2015
core.ctime.nsec = 205679018
core.size = 4194304
core.nblocks = 1024
core.extsize = 0
core.nextents = 1
core.naextents = 0
core.forkoff = 0
core.aformat = 2 (extents)
core.dmevmask = 0
core.dmstate = 0
core.newrtbm = 0
core.prealloc = 0
core.realtime = 0
core.immutable = 0
core.append = 0
core.sync = 0
core.noatime = 0
core.nodump = 0
core.rtinherit = 0
core.projinherit = 0
core.nosymlinks = 0
core.extsz = 0
core.extszinherit = 0
core.nodefrag = 0
core.filestream = 0
core.gen = 3722739155
next_unlinked = null
u.bmx[0] = [startoff,startblock,blockcount,extentflag] 0:[0,5943235,1024,0]
# tail -f /data/test.data &
[1] 27598
# unlink /data/test.data
# xfs_db -xr -c 'inode 29409295' -c p /dev/sda4
core.magic = 0x494e
core.mode = 0100644
core.version = 2
core.format = 2 (extents)
core.nlinkv2 = 1
core._onlink_ = 0
core.projid_lo = 0
core.projid_hi = 0
core.uid = 0
core.gid = 0
core.flushiter = 12
core.atime.sec = Wed Oct 21 16:05:45 2015
core.atime.nsec = 201679018
core.mtime.sec = Wed Oct 21 16:05:45 2015
core.mtime.nsec = 205679018
core.ctime.sec = Wed Oct 21 16:05:45 2015
core.ctime.nsec = 205679018
core.size = 4194304
core.nblocks = 1024
core.extsize = 0
core.nextents = 1
core.naextents = 0
core.forkoff = 0
core.aformat = 2 (extents)
core.dmevmask = 0
core.dmstate = 0
core.newrtbm = 0
core.prealloc = 0
core.realtime = 0
core.immutable = 0
core.append = 0
core.sync = 0
core.noatime = 0
core.nodump = 0
core.rtinherit = 0
core.projinherit = 0
core.nosymlinks = 0
core.extsz = 0
core.extszinherit = 0
core.nodefrag = 0
core.filestream = 0
core.gen = 3722739155
next_unlinked = null
u.bmx[0] = [startoff,startblock,blockcount,extentflag] 0:[0,5943235,1024,0]
As we can see, core.nlinkv2 is still "1" after I unlink /data/test.data.
Thanks,
Ye
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Dave Chinner";<david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Date: Wed, Oct 21, 2015 03:13 PM
To: "YeYin"<eyniy@xxxxxx>;
Cc: "Eric Sandeen"<sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "xfs"<xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
Subject: Re: du result is smaller than xfs_quota report
> > Is anything mounted under that directory hierarchy, and hiding files from du's view?
>
>
> No, Thanks. I found some unlinked inodes, but I can't get some useful information:
>
>
> # xfs_db -xr -c 'agi 1' -c p /dev/sda4
....
> unlinked[0-63] = 0:78272 ....
> # xfs_db -xr -c 'inode 78272' -c p /dev/sda4
That's because 78272 isn't an real inode number. It's a AG relative
inode number ("agino") of 78272. The global inode number folds in
the AG number to it, and this is from AG 1. So:
xfs_db> convert agno 1 agino 78272 ino
<inum>
xfs_db> inode <inum>
xfs_db> p
....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
