On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 05:46:32PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Hi folks, > > As discussed in the recent thread about problems with DAX locking: > > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/2264090?do=post_view_threaded > > I said that I'd post the patch set that fixed the problems for XFS > as soon as I had something sane and workable. That's what this > series is. > > To start with, it passes xfstests "auto" group with only the only > failures being expected failures or failures due to unexpected > allocation patterns or trying to use unsupported block sizes. That > makes it better than any previous version of the XFS/DAX code. > > The patchset starts by reverting the two patches that were > introduced in 4.3-rc1 to try to fix the fault vs fault and fault vs > truncate races that caused deadlocks. This fixes the hangs in > generic/075 that these patches introduced. > > Patch 3 enables XFS to handle the behaviour of DAX and DIO when > asking to allocate the block at (2^63 - 1FSB), where the offset + > count s technically illegal (larger than sb->s_maxbytes) and > overflows a s64 variable. This is currently hidden by the fact that > all DAX and DIO allocation is currently unwritten, but patch 5 > exposes it for DAX. > > Patch 4 introduces the ability for XFS to allocate physically zeroed > data blocks. This is done for each physical extent that is > allocated, deep inside the allocator itself and guaranteed to be > atomic with the allocation transaction and hence has no > crash+recovery exposure issues. > > This is necessary because the BMAPI layer merges allocated extents > in the BMBT before it returns the mapped extent back to the high > level get_blocks() code. Hence the high level code can have a single > extent presented that is made of merged new and existing extents, > and so zeroing can't be done at this layer. > > The advantage of driving the zeroing deep into the allocator is the > functionality is now available to all XFS code. Hence we can > allocate pre-zeroed blocks on any type of storage, and we can > utilise storage-based hardware acceleration (e.g. discard to zero, > WRITE_SAME, etc) to do the zeroing. From this POV, DAX is just > another hardware accelerated physical zeroing mechanism for XFS. :) > > [ This is an example of the mantra I repeat a lot: solve the problem > properly the first time and it will make everything simpler! Sure, > it took me three attempts to work out how to solve it in a sane > manner, but that's pretty much par for the course with anything > non-trivial. ] > > Patch 5 makes __xfs_get_blocks() aware that it is being called from > the DAX fault path and makes sure it returns zeroed blocks rather > than unwritten extents via XFS_BMAPI_ZERO. It also now sets > XFS_BMAPI_CONVERT, which tells it to convert unwritten extents to > written, zeroed blocks. This is the major change of behaviour. > > Patch 6 removes the IO completion callbacks from the XFS DAX code as > they are not longer necessary after patch 5. > > Patch 7 adds pfn_mkwrite support to XFS. This is needed to fix > generic/080, which detects a failure to update the inode timestamp > on a pfn fault. It also adds the same locking as the XFS > implementation of ->fault and ->page_mkwrite and hence provide > correct serialisation against truncate, hole punching, etc that > doesn't currently exist. > > The next steps that are needed are to do the same "block zeroing > during allocation" to ext4, and then the block zeroing and > complete_unwritten callbacks can be removed from the DAX API and > code. I've had a breif look at the ext4 code - the block zeroing > should be able to be done by overloading the existing zeroout code > that ext4 has in the unwritten extent allocation code. I'd much > prefer that an ext4 expert does this work, and then we can clean up > the DAX code... Thank you for working on this, and for documenting your thinking so clearly. One thing I noticed is that in my test setup XFS+DAX is now failing generic/274: # diff -u tests/generic/274.out /root/xfstests/results//generic/274.out.bad --- tests/generic/274.out 2015-08-24 11:05:41.490926305 -0600 +++ /root/xfstests/results//generic/274.out.bad 2015-10-01 13:53:50.498354091 -0600 @@ -2,4 +2,5 @@ ------------------------------ preallocation test ------------------------------ -done +failed to write to test file +(see /root/xfstests/results//generic/274.full for details) I've verified that the test passes 100% of the time with my baseline (v4.3-rc3), and with the set applied but without the DAX mount option. With the series and with DAX it fails 100% of the time. I haven't looked into the details of the failure yet, I just wanted to let you know that it was happening. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
