On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:06:35AM +0300, Mika Eloranta wrote: > > On 22 Sep 2015, at 10:52, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Don't get me wrong here - I will take an updated patch from you for > > this functionality. Both you and Eric have very good points as to > > why mkfs should allow this, but I need to make sure /I/ understand > > the bigger picture before committing it… > > Lesson learned. Coming from my problem domain the feature seemed > obvious, but I can see the need for being more verbose about the “why?” > part. I did not realize this feature is not so commonly used. The usual problem - we're all subject matter experts in our own domains, and what is obvious to us isn't obvious to someone in a slightly different domain, even though they interact at some level. > Regarding updating the patch: “-U uuid” (mkfs.ext*/mkfs.btrfs -style) or > "-m uuid=<uuid>” as per proposal by Carlos? -m uuid=<uuid>, please. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
