On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 09:40:10AM +0800, Zhaohongjiang wrote:
> When I ran xfstest/073 case, the remount process was blocked to wait
> transactions to be zero. I found there was a io error happened, and the
> setfilesize transaction was not released properly. We should add the
> changes to cancel the io error in this case.
>
Thanks for the patch. Was the io error by chance or part of the test? I
ask because it would be good to have test coverage for this if we don't
currently.
> Reproduction steps:
> 1. dd if=/dev/zero of=xfs1.img bs=1M count=2048
> 2. mkfs.xfs xfs1.img
> 3. losetup -f ./xfs1.img /dev/loop0
> 4. mount -t xfs /dev/loop0 /home/test_dir/
> 5. mkdir /home/test_dir/test
> 6. mkfs.xfs -dfile,name=image,size=2g
> 7. mount -t xfs -o loop image /home/test_dir/test
> 8. cp a file bigger than 2g to /home/test_dir/test
> 9. mount -t xfs -o remount,ro /home/test_dir/test
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Hongjiang <zhaohongjiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> index 50ab287..fab55da 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> @@ -212,8 +212,21 @@ xfs_end_io(
> ioend->io_error = -EIO;
> goto done;
> }
> - if (ioend->io_error)
> + if (ioend->io_error) {
> + /*
> + * We should cancel the setfilesize transation when io error
> + * happen.
> + */
> + if (ioend->io_append_trans) {
> + current_set_flags_nested(&ioend->io_append_trans->t_pflags,
> + PF_FSTRANS);
> + rwsem_acquire_read(&VFS_I(XFS_I(ioend->io_inode))->i_sb
> + ->s_writers.lock_map[SB_FREEZE_FS-1], 0, 1, _THIS_IP_);
> + xfs_trans_cancel(ioend->io_append_trans);
Trailing whitespace on the line above.
That aside, I wonder if it would be cleaner to put this stuff in a
helper similar to xfs_setfilesize_ioend(). In fact, we could probably
just update xfs_setfilesize_ioend() to check ioend->io_error after
fixing up the task flags and whatnot and cancel the transaction instead
of calling xfs_setfilesize(). Then, call it here also and update the new
comment to point out that it cancels the transaction on error. Thoughts?
Brian
> + }
> +
> goto done;
> + }
>
> /*
> * For unwritten extents we need to issue transactions to convert a
> --
> 1.8.3.1
> --
> version="9"
> logging="no"
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
