Re: "This is a bug."

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 03:30:30PM +0300, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> On 10 Sep 14:55, Tapani Tarvainen (tapani.j.tarvainen@xxxxxx) wrote:
> > On 10 Sep 13:48, Emmanuel Florac (eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > 
> > > > xfsprogs version 3.1.7+b1.
> > > 
> > > Don't use that, it's much too old. Use at least a 3.2.x version, or if
> > > possible the very latest version of xfs_repair.
> 
> With (self-compiled) 4.2.0 version xfs_repair without -L no longer
> refuses to run but after a while failed with
> 
> [...]
> correcting nextents for inode 2152363147
> xfs_repair: dinode.c:1961: process_inode_data_fork: Assertion `err == 0' failed.
> Aborted
> 
> With -L ... same result.
> 

Care to post the metadump?

Brian

> -- 
> Tapani Tarvainen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs



[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux