Ah, never mind, I noticed I didn't read the last part of Dave's email. It looks clear now.
Jan
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Jan Tulak <jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> index b1c0c10..d532f44 100644
> --- a/libhandle/handle.c
> +++ b/libhandle/handle.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
> #include "xfs.h"
> #include "handle.h"
> #include "parent.h"
> +#include "xfs/xfs_arch.h"
> +#include "xfs/xfs_format.h"
These headers should not be used in libhandle. As mentioned last time I
think libhandle should get it's own LIBHANDLE_XATTR_LIST_MAX define,
separate frome the one for the on disk format.Well, you wrote about adding it into xfs_format.h. I don't recall (and can't find) anything else regarding XATTR_SIZE...> Eww, looks like we depend on these Linux values in the on disk
> defintion. I think we need to add new XFS_XATTR_SIZE_MAX and
> XFS_XATTR_LIST_MAX defintions to xfs_format.h and use them where> we currently use these.So the XFS_ defines in xfs_format.h should be there, I just need to add another LIBHANDLE_ variant so we don't include the headers, right?Cheers,Jan--
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
