On 8/19/15 5:23 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Fix CONFIG_LOCKDEP=n build, because asserts I put in to ensure we
> aren't overrunning lockdep subclasses in commit 0952c81 ("xfs:
> clean up inode lockdep annotations") use a define that doesn't
> exist when CONFIG_LOCKDEP=n
>
> Only check the subclass limits when lockdep is actually enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> index dd584da..30555f8 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> @@ -362,6 +362,17 @@ int xfs_lots_retries;
> int xfs_lock_delays;
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> +static bool
> +xfs_lockdep_subclass_ok(
> + int subclass)
> +{
> + return subclass < MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES;
> +}
> +#else
> +#define xfs_lockdep_subclass_ok(subclass) (true)
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Bump the subclass so xfs_lock_inodes() acquires each lock with a different
> * value. This can be called for any type of inode lock combination, including
> @@ -375,11 +386,12 @@ xfs_lock_inumorder(int lock_mode, int subclass)
>
> ASSERT(!(lock_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_PARENT | XFS_ILOCK_RTBITMAP |
> XFS_ILOCK_RTSUM)));
> + ASSERT(xfs_lockdep_subclass_ok(subclass));
>
> if (lock_mode & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)) {
> ASSERT(subclass <= XFS_IOLOCK_MAX_SUBCLASS);
> - ASSERT(subclass + XFS_IOLOCK_PARENT_VAL <
> - MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES);
> + ASSERT(xfs_lockdep_subclass_ok(subclass +
> + XFS_IOLOCK_PARENT_VAL));
> class += subclass << XFS_IOLOCK_SHIFT;
> if (lock_mode & XFS_IOLOCK_PARENT)
> class += XFS_IOLOCK_PARENT_VAL << XFS_IOLOCK_SHIFT;
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
