Re: [PATCH 11/11] xfsprogs: Add a way to compile without blkid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 06:23:26PM +0200, Jan Tulak wrote:
> UPDATE: default to "signature found", so without blkid is
>         -f mandatory.

Belongs in the cover letter, not this patch.

I forgot to remove it from the patch, sorry for that.
 

>               } else
>                       ft->psectorsize = ft->lsectorsize = BBSIZE;
>       } else {
> +#ifdef ENABLE_BLKID
>               blkid_get_topology(dfile, &ft->dsunit, &ft->dswidth,
>                                  &ft->lsectorsize, &ft->psectorsize,
>                                  force_overwrite);
> +#endif /* ENABLE_BLKID */
>       }
>
>       if (xi->rtname && !xi->risfile) {
>               int sunit, lsectorsize, psectorsize;
>
> +#ifdef ENABLE_BLKID
>               blkid_get_topology(xi->rtname, &sunit, &ft->rtswidth,
>                                  &lsectorsize, &psectorsize, force_overwrite);
> +#endif /* ENABLE_BLKID */

I think you need to proide a dummy blkid_get_topology which at least
sets the two sector sizes to 512.

I don't think so. blkid_get_topology is used only for block devices, not
when mkfs-ing a file. And there are multiple further issues with mkfs
on OS X with system calls, so such dummy call would be for no use.

Although, when I think about it, removing few ifdef would certainly make the code
cleaner, so I think I can make a dummy call for this reason. 

Cheers,
Jan

--
Jan Tulak
jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux