On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:34:24PM +0100, Roger Willcocks wrote:
> Fix an xfs_repair regression reported by Leslie Rhorer where a bad
> (v3) inode version number was not reset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Willcocks <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Roger,
Just a FYI - the patch has mangled whitespace:
in it.
> ---
> db/check.c | 2 +-
> include/libxfs.h | 2 +-
> include/xfs_dinode.h | 10 +++++++++-
> libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c | 2 +-
> repair/dinode.c | 7 +++----
> repair/prefetch.c | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/db/check.c b/db/check.c
> index c4c972f..b5c3b8e 100644
> --- a/db/check.c
> +++ b/db/check.c
> @@ -2637,7 +2637,7 @@ process_inode(
> error++;
> return;
> }
> - if (!XFS_DINODE_GOOD_VERSION(idic.di_version)) {
> + if (!xfs_dinode_good_version(mp, idic.di_version)) {
> if (isfree || v)
> dbprintf(_("bad version number %#x for inode %lld\n"),
> idic.di_version, ino);
All the patch hunks are missing the leading " " for non-modified
lines. I've fixed it manually, but can you make sure future patches
are not mangled?
> --
> 2.5.0.rc0
IMO, it's best not to use development versions of git for anything
other than testing.... ;)
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
