Re: [PATCH][RFC] xfs_copy: don't use DIRECT IO to copy 4k sector device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/13/15 10:07 AM, Zorro Lang wrote:
> When I run xfstests xfs/032 in ppc64le, I hit a failure:
> 
>      xfs_copy: read failed: Invalid argument
>      xfs_copy: size check failed
>      xfs_copy: /dev/sda5 filesystem failed to initialize
>      xfs_copy: Aborting.
>      Copy failed for Sector size 4096 Block size 4096
> 
> I try to use gdb trace xfs_copy. I find it try to open the
> source device with DIRECT flag, then read the device with
> ((1<<BBSHIFT))=512 bytes length. If the source device is
> 4k sector, directly read 512 bytes will be failed.
> 
> xfs_copy '-b' option only work for target file/device, to
> sure it will open the target without DIRECT flag. But useless
> for source device open.
> 
> So I make DIRECT flag only be enabled when source device
> sector size equal BBSIZE.

Which version of xfsprogs did you test?  This is recently upstream:

commit c63ce10a9450020382bbbe2c48788961b19830f4
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Jul 31 09:03:11 2015 +1000

    xfs_copy: fix copy of hard 4k devices
    
    If we have a pure 4k device with no 512 emulation, xfs_copy
    fails straightaway because it tries to do a 512-byte direct
    IO read of the superblock.
    
    Do like we do in xfs_db, and read in the max possible sector size,
    because we don't yet know what the filesystem's sector size is.
    
    This fixes a failure in xfs/032 on a hard 4k device.

-Eric

> Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm not so familiar for xfsprogs, so I'm not sure this's the best
> idea to fix this problem. Please help to check, and maybe give me
> better suggestions.
> 
> Thanks very much,
> Zorro Lang
> 
>  copy/xfs_copy.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/copy/xfs_copy.c b/copy/xfs_copy.c
> index e13f468..1cd6253 100644
> --- a/copy/xfs_copy.c
> +++ b/copy/xfs_copy.c
> @@ -666,7 +666,6 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
>  	/* prepare the libxfs_init structure */
>  
>  	memset(&xargs, 0, sizeof(xargs));
> -	xargs.isdirect = LIBXFS_DIRECT;
>  	xargs.isreadonly = LIBXFS_ISREADONLY;
>  
>  	if (source_is_file)  {
> @@ -689,6 +688,8 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
>  			     1 << (XFS_MAX_SECTORSIZE_LOG - BBSHIFT), 0, NULL);
>  	sb = &mbuf.m_sb;
>  	libxfs_sb_from_disk(sb, XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(sbp));
> +	if (sb->sb_sectsize == BBSIZE)
> +		xargs.isdirect = LIBXFS_DIRECT;
>  
>  	/* Do it again, now with proper length and verifier */
>  	libxfs_putbuf(sbp);
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs



[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux