On 8/7/15 4:37 AM, Brian Foster wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 10:18:50PM -0700, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> mkfs.xfs got weird along the way; today it has different outcomes >> depending on the order of option specification: >> >> $ mkfs/mkfs.xfs -n ftype=1 -m crc=0 -dfile,name=fsfile,size=16g >> cannot specify both crc and ftype >> $ mkfs/mkfs.xfs -m crc=0 -n ftype=1 -dfile,name=fsfile,size=16g >> <succeeds> >> >> Somehow the tests got written as being constrained on what options >> are specified - and in what order! - vs actually testing for >> incompatible feature sets. >> > > IIRC, I think this is one of the core problems the big mkfs option > parsing rework that Jan is working on is supposed to fix. Yeah, I think so - Jan, if this gets in your way, let us know - I didn't mean to make your life difficult by fixing little things while you work. :) -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
