On 8/4/15 8:30 AM, Jan Tulak wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> >> To: "Jan Tulak" <jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx >> Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 7:20:05 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xfsprogs: blkid is now mandatory >> >> On 8/3/15 3:40 AM, Jan Tulak wrote: >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 08:39:36AM -0400, Jan Tulak wrote: >>>>> I just found that while it is possible to get blkid on OS X, it is >>>>> in 1.0.0 version which doesn't have blkid_probe_get function. >>>>> I'm examining whether it is possible to get an updated version there, >>>>> but right now, this patch breaks OS X support. Unfortunately I didn't >>>>> noticed of this before, as the OS X port was terribly out of date. >>>>> >>>>> So this patch shouldn't be included until I find how to get around. >>>> >>>> I don't think this is a lbocker given that OSX support doesn't >>>> even work. >>>> >>>> To the contrary I'd really prefer to go in ASAP to avoid anyone >>>> relying on it longer than nessecary. >>> >>> I tried to get newer blkid on OSX, but so far without a big success >>> (well, it looks like a kind of a small dependency hell that would >>> have to be ported, with bigger or smaller effort...). With regards >>> on the priorities, I think if we can make the OS X support in >>> "manual patching required" way, then? >>> >>> So lets include this patch, and just note it OS X doc "you have to revert >>> commit XXX and re-apply any changes to the relevant code"? >> >> IIRC block device signature detection isn't really required, it's just >> a nice-to-have; perhaps if blkid isn't present, that functionality can >> simply be disabled? > > Signature detection (if I understand you correctly 'signature of existing > FS') could be really disabled, I think. That would take care of > check_overwrite(). However, blkid is also used in get_topology. That one > calls blkid_get_topology, which uses blkid's functions for finding out > sector and io sizes. Well, it would be sane to default to 512 sectors; if that fails it'll be obvious fairly quickly, and the user can always use the command line to specify 4k sectors (or stripe alignment, etc) manually. > What I really can do is to say "on osx, you can mkfs only files," and cut bleah! ;) > out the blkid parts. But it limits the usage on OS X even further. > Although, the removed code for non-blkid systems used platform_findsizes > as fallback. Are there some ugly, terrible monsters who would jump from > under the bed when doing that? Well, the old findsizes was there for this reason, but now it's gone ;) > However, this patch affects only mkfs. It still should be possible to use > xfs_db and xfs_repair even on block devices. I don't know how invasive it'd be, but I think in the absence of blkid, we should still work, but lose signature detection, and fall back to geometry defaults. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs