----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave Chinner" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> What macros, and how do we get them included in the build? I
> shouldn't need to go and use google to work out why a change is
> beign made....
>
> >
> >
> >
>
> This is supposed to match what is required for libxfs/ so we don't
> have to modify the kernel code we bring across. Without knowing
> exactly how we are including conflicting definitions from the OS X
> include files, it's really hard to suggest other possible
> solutions...
>
Ahh, sorry, I already wrote a reply to Chris, but it looks like
I pressed "save" instead "send" - I found it in drafts and not
in send emails. /shy
I will edit the commit message appropriately when resubmitting.
The conflicting macros are LIST_HEAD and LIST_HEAD_INIT.
Here is the reply I didn't sent:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Can you post the compiler warnings you see without this patch?
>
Sure, these:
../include/xfs/list.h:32:9: warning: 'LIST_HEAD' macro redefined [-Wmacro-redefined]
#define LIST_HEAD(name) \
^
/usr/include/sys/queue.h:417:9: note: previous definition is here
#define LIST_HEAD(name, type) \
^
(and the same for LIST_HEAD_INIT)
sys/queue.h is not linked directly, but from many system libraries.
A quick grep on /usr/include/ shows 24 header files including the queue,
sys/mount.h one of them. And I didn't found a way how to avoid it.
If you have an idea what else to to with it, I'm happy to try it.
Cheers,
Jan
--
Jan Tulak
jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
