On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 04:39:30PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> When we're unmapping blocks from a file, we need to decrease refcounts
> in the btree and only free blocks if they refcount is 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 5 +
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_reflink_btree.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_reflink_btree.h | 4 +
> 3 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index 057fa9a..3f5e8da 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
> #include "xfs_symlink.h"
> #include "xfs_attr_leaf.h"
> #include "xfs_filestream.h"
> +#include "xfs_reflink_btree.h"
>
>
> kmem_zone_t *xfs_bmap_free_item_zone;
> @@ -4984,8 +4985,8 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent(
> * If we need to, add to list of extents to delete.
> */
> if (do_fx)
> - xfs_bmap_add_free(mp, flist, del->br_startblock,
> - del->br_blockcount, ip->i_ino);
> + xfs_reflink_bmap_add_free(mp, flist, del->br_startblock,
> + del->br_blockcount, ip->i_ino, tp);
I think this is the wrong abstraction. I think the code should look
like this:
if (do_fx) {
if (xfs_sb_version_hasreflink(&mp->m_sb)) {
error = xfs_reflink_del_extent(mp, tp, flist,
del->br_startblock,
del->br_blockcount, ip->i_ino);
if (error)
goto done;
} else
xfs_bmap_add_free()
}
Because what we are doing is deleting an extent from the reflink
btree, not adding a freed extent to the "to-be-freed" list.
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_reflink_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_reflink_btree.c
> index 380ed72..f40ba1f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_reflink_btree.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_reflink_btree.c
Again, xfs_reflink.c
> @@ -935,3 +935,143 @@ error0:
> xfs_btree_del_cursor(cur, XFS_BTREE_ERROR);
> return error;
> }
> +
> +/**
> + * xfs_reflink_bmap_add_free() - release a range of blocks
> + *
> + * @mp: XFS mount object
> + * @flist: List of blocks to be freed at the end of the transaction
> + * @fsbno: First fs block of the range to release
> + * @len: Length of range
> + * @owner: owner of the extent
> + * @tp: transaction that goes with the free operation
> + */
> +int
> +xfs_reflink_bmap_add_free(
> + struct xfs_mount *mp, /* mount point structure */
> + xfs_bmap_free_t *flist, /* list of extents */
> + xfs_fsblock_t fsbno, /* fs block number of extent */
> + xfs_filblks_t fslen, /* length of extent */
> + uint64_t owner, /* extent owner */
> + struct xfs_trans *tp) /* transaction */
> +{
> + struct xfs_btree_cur *cur;
> + int error;
> + struct xfs_buf *agbp;
> + xfs_agnumber_t agno; /* allocation group number */
> + xfs_agblock_t agbno; /* ag start of range to free */
> + xfs_agblock_t agbend; /* ag end of range to free */
> + xfs_extlen_t aglen; /* ag length of range to free */
> + int i, have;
> + xfs_agblock_t lbno; /* rlextent start */
> + xfs_extlen_t llen; /* rlextent length */
> + xfs_nlink_t lnr; /* rlextent refcount */
> + xfs_agblock_t bno; /* rlext block # in loop */
> + xfs_extlen_t len; /* rlext length in loop */
> + unsigned long long blocks_freed;
> + xfs_fsblock_t range_fsb;
> +
> + if (!xfs_sb_version_hasreflink(&mp->m_sb)) {
> + xfs_bmap_add_free(mp, flist, fsbno, fslen, owner);
> + return 0;
> + }
That canbe dropped.
> +
> + agno = XFS_FSB_TO_AGNO(mp, fsbno);
> + agbno = XFS_FSB_TO_AGBNO(mp, fsbno);
> + CHECK_AG_NUMBER(mp, agno);
> + ASSERT(fslen < mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks);
> + CHECK_AG_EXTENT(mp, agbno, fslen);
These extent lengths have already been checked. If they are invalid,
then the extent deletion would have errored out with corruption
long before we get here.
> + aglen = fslen;
> +
> + /*
> + * Drop reference counts in the reflink tree.
> + */
> + error = xfs_alloc_read_agf(mp, tp, agno, 0, &agbp);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> +
> + /*
> + * Grab a rl btree cursor.
> + */
> + cur = xfs_reflinkbt_init_cursor(mp, tp, agbp, agno);
> + bno = agbno;
> + len = aglen;
> + agbend = agbno + aglen - 1;
> + blocks_freed = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Account for a left extent that partially covers our range.
> + */
> + error = xfs_reflink_lookup_le(cur, bno, &have);
> + if (error)
> + goto error0;
> + if (have) {
> + error = xfs_reflink_get_rec(cur, &lbno, &llen, &lnr, &i);
> + if (error)
> + goto error0;
> + XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_RLEXT_GOTO(mp, i, lbno, llen, lnr, error0);
> + if (lbno + llen > bno) {
> + blocks_freed += min(len, lbno + llen - bno);
> + bno += blocks_freed;
> + len -= blocks_freed;
> + }
> + }
So we unconditionally look up the reflink btree on extent free to
see if we need to free it, even if the inode has not been reflinked?
Doesn't this add a lot of overhead to the extent freeing?
Indeed, why not just mark inodes that have been reflinked (i.e. have
shared extents) with an on-disk flag so that we know if we need to
do reflink btree work or not? That way the code fragment above could
just check an inode flag rather than always calling into this
function for reflink enabled filesystems....
> + while (len > 0) {
> + /*
> + * Go find the next rlext.
> + */
> + range_fsb = XFS_AGB_TO_FSB(mp, agno, bno);
> + error = xfs_btree_increment(cur, 0, &have);
> + if (error)
> + goto error0;
> + if (!have) {
> + /*
> + * There's no right rlextent, so free bno to the end.
> + */
> + lbno = bno + len;
> + llen = 0;
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Find the next rlextent.
> + */
> + error = xfs_reflink_get_rec(cur, &lbno, &llen,
> + &lnr, &i);
> + if (error)
> + goto error0;
> + XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_RLEXT_GOTO(mp, i, lbno, llen, lnr,
> + error0);
> + if (lbno >= bno + len) {
> + lbno = bno + len;
> + llen = 0;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Free everything up to the start of the rlextent and
> + * account for still-mapped blocks.
> + */
> + if (lbno - bno > 0) {
> + xfs_bmap_add_free(mp, flist, range_fsb, lbno - bno,
> + owner);
> + len -= lbno - bno;
> + bno += lbno - bno;
> + }
> + llen = min(llen, agbend + 1 - lbno);
> + blocks_freed += llen;
> + len -= llen;
> + bno += llen;
> + }
> +
> + xfs_btree_del_cursor(cur, XFS_BTREE_NOERROR);
> +
> + error = xfs_reflinkbt_adjust_refcount(mp, tp, agbp, agno, agbno, aglen,
> + -1);
Hmmm - we just walked the btree to determine what extents to
free, and now we are going to walk the btree again to drop the
reference counts on shared extents? So every extent that gets freed
does two walks of the reflink btree regardless of the whether it has
shared blocks or not?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
