Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: validate transaction header length on log recovery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This looks sensible to me, but I still can't make sense of the old
code which just conditionally copied it even after taking a brief
look at the pre-git history of this code.  Does anyone understand why
the code was like this?   Fixing code that seems to have had an
intention I can't make sense of always feel dangerous.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs



[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux