On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 01:32:17PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 6/8/15 1:29 PM, Brian Foster wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 10:06:34AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> When doing an obfuscated xfs_metadump, if the log is clean, zero > >> it out for 2 reasons: > >> > >> * It'll make the image more compressible > >> * It'll eliminate an un-obfuscated metadata source > >> > >> If the log isn't clean, and the user expected obfuscation, warn > >> that metadata in the log will not be obfuscated. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> > >> V2: If not obfuscating, copy log as-is > >> > > > > FYI, I think v1 of this was already pulled into the for-next branch. > > Anyways... > > Yeah, I noticed - I'll ask dave to fix it (that one rebases, right?) :) Just send a delta patch against what I committed, that way I don't need to rebase the tree. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
