On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 09:48:03AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 5/10/15 7:05 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Hi folks, > > ... > > > This userspace update work needs to > > be distributed over the developers making the API and functionality > > changes, so I'm throwing this out there to see what people think > > about solving this problem. > > ... > > > So, what do the people I'm asking to do more work so I don't have > > to spend so much time on time consuming maintenance tasks think? > > I think it makes perfect sense, and I'm happy to do it. The giant > sync-ups after the fact have never been ideal from any perspective. > > I'm glad you brought this up; I don't think anyone ever meant to simply > leave this to the maintainer - it just ended up that way, because the > rules or best practices weren't necessarily clear. *nod* > So; do you envision a 0/8 patch series, 4 of which touch libxfs, to > now be a 0/12 patch series, with the userspace bits i.e. at the end? > I'd be perfectly happy with this; once libxfs stays up to date in > userspace, it should be trivial. I'd expect separate patch series, because it's kinda hard to do a git send-email or guilt patchbomb that spans mutltiple repositories.... :P Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
