-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Martin, Thanks for your reply, yes I've read that link, but another question, is noatime,nodiratime,etc still valid for performance tuning guidance? Even the default mount options only "rw,inode64,seclabel,attr2". Is it still increase the performance if the additional mount options added? On 5/7/2015 18:49, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 7. Mai 2015, 18:24:09 schrieb Dewangga: >> Hello! >> >> I'm new on XFS and curious about any tune/tweak regarding XFS >> filesystem on any raid array, non-raid, ssd or non-ssd. But, is >> there any valid value to determine about the performance? At >> least valid benchmark result (eg. using fio with some parameters, >> or any method). >> >> Then, about bsize, sectsz, etc, is there any wiki/guidelines how >> to set them on a right way? > > Ok, one additional thing: > > Use recent kernel and userspace utilities. > > Cause defaults are updated sometimes and with recent tools you get > best out of box experience. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVS1eBAAoJEF1+odKB6YIxyQwH/Am1bC+YhydmoWOknAMgjrEI 3mTmeUu0O/p90+DsXPS04zjht18XzsZKVTASVraPgPcrgzoqlHtHflK55++YIKp2 SLbFI2IexNLNbffyUgM7NCCpEjKZLkN8v4eNP2ylSgQqK4DTzwWPDypF16FX/rlc 2WuvQINR345i8rwjPryMbZAHiCem3ewYssx34jfH5NPh9CoRo1mnuFCEHzz9IG3L 4u0Z7zTKHZQPDaRzC3MVO5wOZNelnWXcP2TwiDJF3LgdEzWTinQGthEKy5ytSPPI xRZvJnzUvXWt6JNuWCUjtIUV3ODhBctfkk200wvMUyBdQg7Zo+OiXXOyaA24GsU= =wHBL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
